I now have absolute certainty that God is real. Now all I have to do is explain it. I will be doing so gradually.
Good luck with that.
I am glad that you are certain that god exists. I can understand you wanting to inform everyone of this but this is the wrong section. God belongs in the religion section not the science section. The post was reported.I now have absolute certainty that God is real. Now all I have to do is explain it. I will be doing so gradually.
Unfortunately the math is useless because the Prof is psychotic. He believes among other things that this equation revealed to him by God Almighty will defeat Boko Haram.Will you mind dissecting the math, that is actually the reason I made this thread to check the mathematical validation of the equations.
Please put this in the cesspool. All this thread will end up doing is ridiculing Dr. Oyibo, an obviously unbalanced person.
Who is Boka Haram?Unfortunately the math is useless because the Prof is psychotic. He believes among other things that this equation revealed to him by God Almighty will defeat Boko Haram.
The "math" (such as it is) is not worth discussing.Let's not make this about him I came here to discuss the math please keep it objective.
Unfortunately the math is useless because the Prof is psychotic. He believes among other things that this equation revealed to him by God Almighty will defeat Boko Haram.
What are you talking about? It is only about him. His TOE is the ravings of a psychotic person.Let's not make this about him I came here to discuss the math please keep it objective.
Really? Google Boko Haram.Who is Boka Haram?
Pi is constant in Euclidean (static) space. As soon as things begin either to move or accelerate (or rotate), lengths, including those associated with radii and circumference of ideal circles in Euclidean geometry, contract in the direction of motion/propagation. Relativistic space or space which moves as a function of time is non Euclidean.Please clarify what you mean by Pi isn't constant?
You should buy his book for a mere $199 and then ask your questions because the only math I saw was Gij = God and that was not covered in my math classes.It's not objective to say mental illness makes math irrelevant there have been many great minds in the past that the general public has deemed mentally ill but that never changed the fact that they still made major contributions to knowledge and human awareness.
The "math" (such as it is) is not worth discussing.
As has already been noted in more than one reply.
The guy is a loon.
His "math" is bullsh*t.
I have no opinion on this
but I have been hearing about it for months now, it's old news.
I never arrive, I'm omnipresent.My friend spider I see you have arrived...hmm
I agree, this comment of yours is my motivation, there are many great individuals that go unnoticed mostly becuase the media is a biased propaganda machine controlled by a small group of people. I don't care about anyone's opinions unless they contain factually sound critism specifically addressing the math. As I stated before if you do not want to use God as the unchanging framework use something else but am just curious as if the math works in the specific context it was introduced.You must have had some motive for starting the thread. At the very least, you find the guy's claims interesting for some reason.
Where have you been hearing about it? My impression is that this guy is pretty obscure. Given the grandiose nature of his claims, there seems to have been very little response in the mainstream academic world. Not only do physicists seem uninterested, theologians and scholars in religious studies aren't excited either. So who is talking about him? In what context? What are they saying?
Uh, yes it is. Because the "math" is a product of his deranged mind.It's not objective to say mental illness makes math irrelevant
So what?there have been many great minds in the past that the general public has deemed mentally ill but that never changed the fact that they still made major contributions to knowledge and human awareness.[
I assume from this response that you have comprehension difficulties.It's obvious you don't in believe God, but if that is your only reason to completely dismiss his claims then the purpose of the op has not been satisfied. So I guess you believe the math is solid but you do not believe the foundation it is built on?
No, it leaves it being bullshit because it's bullshit.So that leaves a consequence of it bieng "bullshit" in your own word?
Uh what "unchanging independent constant variable" (and what's a "constant variable?) is there any evidence for? Where did it come from? How well established is it? Or is it, like Oyibo's, simply introduced because he wants to "prove" his initial assumption and will do anything to arrive at that (and unsupported) pre-formed conclusion?Ok let's for a moment substitute God with some unchanging constant independent variable then return to the math will the math still hold will there be any holes in the math with this approach.
Will you mind dissecting the math, that is actually the reason I made this thread to check the mathematical validation of the equations.