This has many meanings but the literal one is the strongest, but even seeing it does not only mean vision in my interpretation.
Causal Dynamical Triangulation (CDT).What is CDT?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulationCausal dynamical triangulation (abbreviated as CDT) invented by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and popularized by Fotini Markopoulou and Lee Smolin, is an approach to quantum gravity that like loop quantum gravity is background independent. This means that it does not assume any pre-existing arena (dimensional space), but rather attempts to show how the spacetime fabric itself evolves.
My dear you complicate things, if you were a piece of code in my virtual simulation, then somehow you were curious as to what your origin is. Then you decide to do research on all the moving points and parts of the system. You cut of piece of your body and put it under a microscope. You take data, you now know how your body works functionally and a little about what it is made of, but yet you still remain empty, hungry, and even more confused. You have many material riches but still desire love and companionship.Why should this be, did you ever asked yourself what made you curious in the first place? After all you had no choice. We often think we can find the mind by looking in the brain, to be blind is a beautiful thing.
Causal Dynamical Triangulation (CDT).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation
IMO, the fact that it is "background independent" is an implication of an abstract mathematical function, unrelated but equal to any notion of God.
Sorry, but IMO, it is you who is complicating things. How can human imagination be in any way equated with the fundamental causal properties of reality itself, except through the mathematical function from chaos to order and the evolution of life and "awareness" on (for one) earth.
Inquisitiveness (information gathering) is displayed in all moving organisms, whether intended or not.
I am speaking of an emergent "awareness" from simple organisms to the human brain, depending on the evolution of sensory abilities and processing of information.
This self-organizing (evolving) awareness is still subjective to that awareness only.
An example may be found in the brainless "slime mold". A competent mathematician.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/brainless-slime-molds/
And why should it work at all? I hope you see the beauty in it all its artistic genius if you ask me. A unified system evolving as distinct seperate parts all having a common origin.
I hated art and music in grade school. But as I evolved Actually much later in my life my 20s I began to appreciate art and music more. Actually I just saw the connection that creation is art but when you link the dual connection with logic the simple truth is completely obvious.Artistic ; none sense.
Arts does have it's place.
The Universe is NOT just about the arts.
Arts don't have have the want, desire or exploration of science, at all.
Arts are cultural expression, nothing more.
I hated art and music in grade school. But as I evolved Actually much later in my life my 20s I began to appreciate art and music more. Actually I just saw the connection that creation is art but when you link the dual connection with logic the simple truth is completely obvious.
That art is actually more important than you and me give it credit for I dissed art in my young days just as you did.What is completely " obvious " ?
Everything is the gravitational field and it evolves it's the operator that expresseses values. It's your thoughts your life forms your mind your soul your consciousness your awareness. As well as your past and your future your good and your bad your dual and your singular. Your probable and deterministic your all in all sending tramissions to your brain via its constant speed of c.
a) The common denominator of everything is "potential" The language of potential is mathematical.Yes I agree with both statements both spacetime and life forms are evolving. Don't you see the common denominator everything is evolving why? Quantum fluctuations what are they in my opinion, they are codes just like how a computer programmer would make software. The flux is is pre-embeded in space at data points that direct space time like a printer. They give instructions to electromagnetic fields like DNA. But since only the author knows the code like your password sort of to everyone else it becomes a guessing game enter probability. God can give you the cheat codes.
a) The common denominator of everything is "potential" The language of potential is mathematical.
b) The human mind has developed an accurate common language of mathematics.
Potential is defined as "That which may become Reality". Can you improve on that with a definition of God?
Yes I cana) The common denominator of everything is "potential" The language of potential is mathematical.
b) The human mind has developed an accurate common language of mathematics.
Potential is defined as "That which may become Reality". Can you improve on that with a definition of God?
Yes it's an obvious assumption to me but only my opinion none the less. It feels right I have been thinking about this for over 27 years.Your obvious is based on assumptions.
Everything has very restrictive limits (natural laws). If the potential for something is not sufficiently reinforced by other potentials, there is but a fleeting moment of expression. Hence the term "flux".Disagree
To have potential one must understand ones limits , the arts have very restrictive limits.
That paragraph makes no sense to me.Mathematics is based on logic and the foundation of logic is based on the reasoning given; and reasoning is based on the knowledge known. When the knowledge changes so to does the reason and therefore the logic.
Only if you assume a motivated sentience that can think at all, other than being implaccably logical in nature, such as the (abstract) mathematical function (potential)Logic is the last line of thought. Not the first. Reason is first.
Yes it's an obvious assumption to me but only my opinion none the less. It feels right I have been thinking about this for over 27 years.
Correct, a subjective individual viewpoint. As to knowledge on the actual nature of how things work depends on the source and subjective interpretation of that knowledgeYes it's an obvious assumption to me but only my opinion none the less. It feels right I have been thinking about this for over 27 years.
Something like "six degrees of separation"?Well I've been thinking for a good 35yrs+. But anyway god is not absolute.
My thinking upon god many yrs ago. Is that the Universe could be inside the Brain of a BEING , not a god , a being. And this being is learning about its self, through this beings gathering of information from this beings without and then thinking upon or dwelling upon this info.
And we obviously are connected to this being simply because we are in this Universe or mind.
Mathematics is based on logic and the foundation of logic is based on the reasoning given; and reasoning is based on the knowledge known. When the knowledge changes so to does the reason and therefore the logic.
That paragraph makes no sense to me.
Something like "six degrees of separation"?
Well I've been thinking for a good 35yrs+. But anyway god is not absolute.
My thinking upon god many yrs ago. Is that the Universe could be inside the Brain of a BEING , not a god , a being. And this being is learning about its self, through this beings gathering of information from this beings without and then thinking upon or dwelling upon this info.
And we obviously are connected to this being simply because we are in this Universe or mind.