Promiscuity

lixluke said:
OMG. What did you not get about the explanation regarding that question? http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2109628&postcount=41
Click to expand...

Oh, I get you all right. That post was hypocritical and full of shit.

Because of this social structure, there is no reason for me to see a promiscuous boy in the same light as a promiscuous girl. A boy can sleep with different girls, and still have high standards in his choices. A girl who sleeps with different guys means she has low standards. A person with low standards is not very attractive.

Sperms go for egg. Sperm that reaches the egg is the winner. Guys that get the girl is the winner. Getting more girls is not going to make him look worser. Egg will get the winnder sperm. Girls getting a guy to sleep with is not a huge task. Girls sleeping with lots of guys means she is not very selective.
Click to expand...

A promiscuous male can have high standards but not a promiscuous female? Your logic needs some fucking Superglue.

The second part is rubbish. Girls who sleep with loads of guys are not doing it to have babies. They're doing to for pleasure. Just because they are serial monogamists doesn't mean they won't be selective when choosing an actual life partner as opposed to a quick fuck.
 
NOTICE:

If you are looking for a quick fuck... please post this fact publicly... I'm sure you can be paired with someone...

Thanks for your time!
 
mikenostic said:
I'm very sorry you lack the mental capacity to understand that sex with a lot of people isn't good. I can see your lack of mental capacity in this manner because you've obviously failed to read any of my previous posts in this thread that state the reasons why being a slut is bad. Please do not respond or comment until you obtain the mental diversity to understand where I'm coming from. Thanks.
Click to expand...
All of your "reasons" seem to be based on the a priori assumption that sex with many people is bad. You say that having sex with many people shows a lack of respect for oneself, emotional problems, etc. But those reasons only make sense if you assume a priori that having sex with many people is bad, and is therefor something that is shameful or that only a person with emotional issues would engage in. The only potentially valid reason you have actually given is STDs, and you'll note I said "assuming they're smart enough to know how to use a condom."
 
visceral_instinct said:
Oh, I get you all right. That post was hypocritical and full of shit.



A promiscuous male can have high standards but not a promiscuous female? Your logic needs some fucking Superglue.

The second part is rubbish. Girls who sleep with loads of guys are not doing it to have babies. They're doing to for pleasure. Just because they are serial monogamists doesn't mean they won't be selective when choosing an actual life partner as opposed to a quick fuck.
Click to expand...
That's nice. You're saying there is no difference between a guy sleeping with lots of girls and a girl sleeping with lots of guys. Regardless of the cultural structure of inequality.
Standard: Few guys get many girls.
Not standard: Few girls get many guys.

To elaborate:
Consider a set of 10 males and 10 females.
2 out of those 10 males can sleep with all 10 females.
Meanwhile, 2 out of those 10 females may be willing to sleep with the remaning 8 males.

Whle 10 out of 10 males being able to sleep with any female might be a more accurate representation of the matter, I'd like to know what people think about that model.

Either way, it might be likely that girls who like bastards will not sleep with me. I'm very happy about that because I am honestly not really attracted to girls who like bastards.
 
lixluke said:
That's nice. You're saying there is no difference between a guy sleeping with lots of girls and a girl sleeping with lots of guys. Regardless of the cultural structure of inequality.
Standard: Few guys get many girls.
Not standard: Few girls get many guys.

To elaborate:
Consider a set of 10 males and 10 females.
2 out of those 10 males can sleep with all 10 females.
Meanwhile, 2 out of those 10 females may be willing to sleep with the remaning 8 males.

Whle 10 out of 10 males being able to sleep with any female might be a more accurate representation of the matter, I'd like to know what people think about that model.

Either way, it might be likely that girls who like bastards will not sleep with me. I'm very happy about that because I am honestly not really attracted to girls who like bastards.
Click to expand...

Rubbish, you have no evidence, you're just making assumptions, and in any case real life doesn't involve a test group of 10 males and 10 females.

A woman who meets a lot of men who she likes in her life and goes out with those men is not being insulting to maleness. She's just acting on her feelings like a human being. Why is that wrong for a woman but not a man?
 
Culturally: Guys are pathetic, and girls are great.

1. Girls are great. It isn't as easy for males to get it from great females. A male who gets it is considered lucky. One who gets it often is glorified.

2. Guys are pathetic. Females, on the other hand, have to fight males off with a stick on a daily base it. It is not a big deal for a female to get some from some pathetic guy. A girl who sleeps with many of these pathetic beings would likely be doing so out of one thing. Desperation.
 
Simon Anders said:
I have the same proclivity, and heck, I am married now and happy with the arrangement.
Click to expand...

We decided marriage had too much baggage.

Certainly if you want kids, long term is the way to go.

lixluke doesn't seem to realize he is a bastard and he is only getting "ho's" with his current strategy.

I kind of feel for the "ho's" though. Its impossible to be good in the sack or an interesting person and have a "revolving door."

The only way to have a revolving door is to be some one no woman wants a second time.
 
lixluke said:
Culturally: Guys are pathetic, and girls are great.

1. Girls are great. It isn't as easy for males to get it from great females. A male who gets it is considered lucky. One who gets it often is glorified.

2. Guys are pathetic. Females, on the other hand, have to fight males off with a stick on a daily base it. It is not a big deal for a female to get some from some pathetic guy. A girl who sleeps with many of these pathetic beings would likely be doing so out of one thing. Desperation.
Click to expand...

Just because she has had many partners doesn't mean she will have anyone no matter how ugly or stupid.
 
visceral_instinct said:
Just because she has had many partners doesn't mean she will have anyone no matter how ugly or stupid.
Click to expand...

Yeah, see, that's why men don't like whores or "loose" women ....they go out with OTHER men but not with us!

How many sex partners does it take for a woman to be known as a whore or as promiscuous? I've always wondered that question.

If she has 4,000 different partners, I think we can mostly agree that she's a whore or that she's promiscuous.

But what about a girl who has, say, four different partners in her whole life? Is she a whore or promiscuous?

How 'bout 10?

Or is it just that we, the men mostly, who assign that "title" to women that fuck others but not ourselves? :D

Baron Max
 
visceral_instinct said:
Just because she has had many partners doesn't mean she will have anyone no matter how ugly or stupid.
Click to expand...
In what reality? A girl sleeps around with lots of guys often. Yet none of them are pathetic bastards? All of them are smart, funny, kind, and caring. Sure. Happens all the time. In the twilight zone.

In this day and age, it is quite mandatory, that if a girl is sleeping with guys often, it might as well be assumed that the guy is some ugly musculine bastard with no brain who bullies others.

If a girl is sleeping around often, and with good people, more power to her. I would give her the medal of honor. If you can show me that, you will see my jaw drop to the bottom of the ocean in amazement.
:jawdrop:
 
Obviously not all gals are picky or lixluke wouldn't ever get any, well assuming he ever does get any, but we can't conclude that all gals who are promiscuous aren't picky based on this.

In fact since a loser like lixluke claims to have some low level of standard, I'd say its entirely reasonable that gals have at least the same level of standard at the same level of promiscuity.
 
Some people make it so plain & clear to others that their view is biased yet can't see it for themselves. I wonder if they reread their posts.
1111
 
Who me? Bias because I have a realistic view of society? Am I wrong that girls who sleep around have low standards? And you're saying that there are girls who sleep around with highs standards? Am I on the wrong planet?
 
lixluke said:
Who me? Bias because I have a realistic view of society? Am I wrong that girls who sleep around have low standards? And you're saying that there are girls who sleep around with highs standards? Am I on the wrong planet?
Click to expand...
What exactly do we mean by "standards"? There are plenty of hot, slutty women who know they are good-looking and will only go to bed with good-looking guys who spend a few hours at the gym each week. It's relatively easy for women to be both slutty and picky (with respect to looks) if they're good looking themselves, especially if they live in a big city or college town where there's no shortage of good-looking men.
 
Standards as in - there are boys. Each boy wants to have sex with a hot girl as much as the next boy. When a girl sleeps around lots, it's likely she's choosing some bastard that boxes down nice friendly boys as opposed to a nice friendly boy that gets boxed down by bastards.
Either:
-You are a bastard boxing down some nice friendly boy.
Or
-You are a nice friendly boy getting boxed down by some bastard.

There is no such thing as a bastard that doesn't box down nice friendly boys. There is no such thing as nice friendly boys that don't get boxed down by bastards.
 
lixluke said:
Standards as in - there are boys. Each boy wants to have sex with a hot girl as much as the next boy. When a girl sleeps around lots, it's likely she's choosing some bastard that boxes down nice friendly boys as opposed to a nice friendly boy that gets boxed down by bastards.
Either:
-You are a bastard boxing down some nice friendly boy.
Or
-You are a nice friendly boy getting boxed down by some bastard.

There is no such thing as a bastard that doesn't box down nice friendly boys. There is no such thing as nice friendly boys that don't get boxed down by bastards.
Click to expand...
If the woman in question is just looking for some fun sex, she might not care that the guy is a bastard - so long as he has a good body and is fun in bed.
 
:itold: You are all sinners and adulterers. Repent or suffer eternal damnation.







But if you're female, please post a few sexy pics, first.:mufc:
 
Nasor said:
If the woman in question is just looking for some fun sex, she might not care that the guy is a bastard - so long as he has a good body and is fun in bed.
Click to expand...
Yes. Nobody is debating this. TY!:thankyou:

She might care that he is not a bastard. Girls typically don't like boys who get boxed down by bastards. They typically like bastards who box down boys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top