I think Wales (or at least the Welsh) would object to being called a "sea monster" (although it does tend to rain a lot there) and the plural of octopus is octopuses, octopi or octopodes.
i thought whales looked wrong..and octopi was intentional..
I think Wales (or at least the Welsh) would object to being called a "sea monster" (although it does tend to rain a lot there) and the plural of octopus is octopuses, octopi or octopodes.
Ha! Wales looks "wrong" too. I've been there and seen it.i thought whales looked wrong
Er, you wrote "octopussies".and octopi was intentional..
This is all quite irrelevant really because no matter how you twist it, a literal reading of Genesis does not match what actually happened, even just here on earth. You think that the creatures really came into being in that order? If you do then you should also be aware that the bible misses quite a few steps.
Like I said though, it's irrelevant because a literal Genesis simply can not be reconciled with what we know to be true. Why else would biblical creationists be trying so desperately to discredit science?
@Jan --
Well then we've got a problem because the Genesis creation story says that plants were created before the sun was, and that's just plain impossible.
Desert monster?Wasn't there a desert monster named Wales? Josey Wales?
Ha!just to give us a story about how bad we are and it all boils down to fruit or something.
Well you said to blame it on the fruit.gay?
No, I don't need to know exactly what the bible literally says in the original language to argue against a literal interpretation. All I need to do is point at an animal(doesn't matter which one) and say "the theory of evolution", and I win. It's that simple.
@Jan --
Well then we've got a problem because the Genesis creation story says that plants were created before the sun was, and that's just plain impossible.
So what?Have you heard that the moon was formed doe to a collision between earth and an other planet ?
No.So the earth was hear already and there was light
So what?
That says nothing about the Sun being there.
In the beginning there was light
would you think the sun was there and not a flash light
light
No.
Try reading the thread!No what
Have you heard that the moon was formed doe to a collision between earth and an other planet?
So the earth was hear already and there was light , and plant could grow using photosynthesis, It is not known how fast was the earth spinning prior collision .
So you like this answer . .
Try reading the thread!
The Sun wasn't created until the fourth day.
(And it was dark in the beginning).
Keep trying:Gen. 1 verse 3 " let there be light and there was light "
1In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Pardon?From were does the light comes ? perhaps from your flash light
Please think , Physic
Think physics? Really? Explain "god" with physics. Explain how god managed to speak in a vacuum.16And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. 17And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, 18And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. 19And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
Moon AND SUN.Latter come come the moon , , Probable to show there two kind of illumination