Pro-lifers, explain your perspective for me please

Status
Not open for further replies.
Origionaly posted by cluelusshusbund
Does you'r God take responsibility for anythang.???



What does he take responsibility for.???
governing both a universe and the multitudes of living entities for a start


For esample... if i build a house wit inferior products an it falls down i escept responsigility for it fallin down... if i breed a short leged dog an enter it in a race wit long legged dogs... i woud escept responsibilty for it loosin insted of blamin the dog an punishin it for eternity.!!!
so IOW once we understand the values you have in place for a given, we can understand the issues of responsibility at hand

so it would kind of silly to expect you to take responsibility for opening a can with a kitchen knife when you had the intention of slicing carrots with it?
yes



PS
Which God do you bow down to.???
the triple 0 omni god
(omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent)
 
Origionaly posted by cluelusshusbund
Which God do you bow down to.??? ”

the triple 0 omni god
(omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent)

I guess thats the Holey-Bible God.!!!

What does he take responsibility for.??? ”

governing both a universe and the multitudes of living entities for a start

Does he take responsibility for creatin humans in such a way that falure was inevitable.???
 
Origionaloy posted by cluelusshusbund
Does he take responsibility for creatin humans in such a way that falure was inevitable.???

like a kitchen knife is a failure for opening a can?

Not that i know of... but does God take responsibility for creatin humans in such a way that falure was inevitable.???
 
Origionaloy posted by cluelusshusbund
Does he take responsibility for creatin humans in such a way that falure was inevitable.???



Not that i know of... but does God take responsibility for creatin humans in such a way that falure was inevitable.???
its not clear what failure you are talking about

(BTW you might wanna hold back on the religious questioning, since some mods don't like certain things to be discussed, even in the free thoughts forum)
 
SAM said:
The only time a three month embryo is ever considered to be a human being in ordinary life, by anyone, is when abortion comes up. The rest of the time, it's part of the mother, potential, medical waste, etc, and always has been

Really? Ask any 3 month pregnant woman what she thinks of this medical waste.
I don't have to ask - I have lots of well documented behavior to draw conclusions from, including the easily observed fact that if a three month pregnancy is ectopic, or miscarries, or dies in the womb, it has never been and will not be treated as a child is treated, dead or alive - by the mother or anyone else.

The only time a three month embryo is a living human child is when a woman wants to abort her pregnancy.

lightg said:
The ordinary and well known - by failure of the adopted technique - same as any other.

How do you think they measure the failure rate of condoms?

I guess by that measure you could rate forgetfulness to purchase a condom as condom failure
Just compare failure rates by the same criteria for all strategies, apples to apples, see if you get the same numbers the pros get.
lg said:
and pregnancy bears no connection to desire or impulse?
That connection is beyond your knowledge, expertise, wisdom, or just powers, to establish.
lg said:
Which God do you bow down to.???

the triple 0 omni god
(omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent)
Your invention there is a bit self-contradictory, as well as reality deprived - it might work better if it answered to reason. As would the moral reality you pretend to subscribe to, when you wish to impose it on others.
 
Just compare failure rates by the same criteria for all strategies, apples to apples, see if you get the same numbers the pros get.
I guess apples and oranges forget condoms at the rate of 100%
That connection is beyond your knowledge, expertise, wisdom, or just powers, to establish.
Not everyone requires roofies

Your invention there is a bit self-contradictory, as well as reality deprived - it might work better if it answered to reason. As would the moral reality you pretend to subscribe to, when you wish to impose it on others.
well golly, if that's what you believe its just gotta be true, mustn't it?
:shrug:
 
Originally Posted by cluelusshusbund
Why does God punish humans which he intentionaly created defective.???

whats the intentional defect?

For 1... morals so poor that som adults sesually abuse children.!!!


(BTW you might wanna hold back on the religious questioning, since some mods don't like certain things to be discussed, even in the free thoughts forum)

The religous questons have to do wit understandin the "Pro-life" position... but If Enmos interfears i will start a new thred an continue on wit the sam questons... no biggy... then we will have anuther thred about understandin the the Pro-life perspective.!!!
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by cluelusshusbund
Why does God punish humans which he intentionaly created defective.???



For 1... morals so poor that som adults sesually abuse children.!!!
This is headed right down the highway of the role of free will in a universe that offers both punishment and reward .... IOW its the very nature of being an (infinitesimal) individual that one choose certain types of association and in turn be influenced by those choices.

IOW if we didn't have the opportunity to make bad choices we wouldn't have the opportunity to make choices at all (so even a good act would be meaningless).

Kind of like suppose someone walks into a bank and in the process of opening the door he accidentally knocks out a bank robber who had just killed 10 people. You wouldn't expect them to receive a national award. Similarly if a big giant picked you up and used you as a club to start beating children, its not like you would be liable for an indictment of child abuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top