What happened to number 2 ?
offer a suggestion that a god who maintains a world with strict laws is not perfect and I can happily submit it
What happened to number 2 ?
offer a suggestion that a god who maintains a world with strict laws is not perfect and I can happily submit it
offer a suggestion that a god who maintains a world with strict laws is not perfect and I can happily submit it
number twoSimply done...
A 'perfect' entity would lack nothing and therefore would not have any needs or wants and as such would not go about creating vastly inferior creatures to serve and worship it.
number two
(all we need now is an argument that an infallible god would not have recourse to providing irregularities within nature - like rain for eg - and we will have a complete picture)
assuming you are willing to progress with the notion that god could theoretically exist, why would god be residing in nothingness?Unsurprisngly enough your post is irrelevant to what I said. What I mentioned was that a 'perfect' entity would never create anything to worship it because it has no need to, no wants.. because it lacks nothing. It would be content in it's own realm of nothingness. The minute it creates, it's not perfect.. it is a being that succumbs to emotional needs.
assuming you are willing to progress with the notion that god could theoretically exist, why would god be residing in nothingness?
Alas this isn't relevant. Here it is again:
An entity that is perfect would lack nothing and as such would have no wants or needs. It would not, by the very fact of its perfection, create other beings to serve and worship it.
hence two suggestionsAlas this isn't relevant. Here it is again:
An entity that is perfect would lack nothing and as such would have no wants or needs. It would not, by the very fact of its perfection, create other beings to serve and worship it.
Perfect? Why does the world have hideous birth defects, hideous diseases and hideous people?
Well it certainly makes you immune to these arguments doesn't it?!
hence two suggestions
god is not existing in a state of nothingness (ie god has eternal contingent potencies, of which the living entity is one)
god does not benefit from our service - rather we do
a contingent eternal potency wouldn't be a creation1) Whether god lives in nothingness or in a three bedroom town house isn't really the issue other than to state a perfect being that lacks nothing would be content without the need to create anything.
2) Whether you benefit from bowing to sky fairies or not is not the issue. That you were created is.
a contingent eternal potency wouldn't be a creation
[*]god does not benefit from our service - rather we do
[/LIST]