Possibility of star formation around black holes

river said:
No , the material , the energy , comes from the galactic core

Your mistaking two stars , one drawing , energy , from the other . This has nothing to do with galactic jets

Anybody reading this thread would know this
Click to expand...

Anybody else reading these posts in this voice:
shatner1.jpg
 
river,

it's massively obvious that your comments are nothing more than purposely argumentative causing nonsense.
 
Kittamaru said:
this topic makes my brain hurt...
Click to expand...

It's pretty simple really. Think of a black hole like an atomic nucleus, a quasar representing the path of an electron in a circuit, and a star appearing or going supernova like a chemical reaction observed from the positive end or negative end of a circuit respectively.
 
Beaconator said:
It's pretty simple really. Think of a black hole like an atomic nucleus, a quasar representing the path of an electron in a circuit, and a star appearing or going supernova like a chemical reaction observed from the positive end or negative end of a circuit respectively.
Click to expand...

... why would I do that?
 
Beaconator said:
It's pretty simple really. Think of a black hole like an atomic nucleus, a quasar representing the path of an electron in a circuit, and a star appearing or going supernova like a chemical reaction observed from the positive end or negative end of a circuit respectively.
Click to expand...

Why think of anything other than what is simply is?
A BH need not reside in a QUASAR or AGN....
 
paddoboy said:
Yep, correct, but all galactic cores do have BH's ;)
Click to expand...

Based on what evidence ?

So far there is no sound theory that explains the galactic jets coming from , any galactic core

As well , since a , BH , is a singularity , how is it that these , galactic jets , have , this energy spewing out from two opposite poles of the galaxy
 
Let some time go by, and then back to the same trolling.
 
river's asked:
based on what evidence?
_________________________________________

You have been informed of the myriads of evidence for SMBH's many time.
Being in denial is sad.
___________________________________________
rivers said:
So far there is no sound theory that explains the galactic jets coming from , any galactic core
_________________________________________________________

Your denial problem has reared its ugly head again.
Again the polar jets have been explained to you.

_____________________________________________________________________
rivers said
As well , since a , BH , is a singularity , how is it that these , galactic jets , have , this energy spewing out from two opposite poles of the galaxy
__________________________________________________________________

More denial....more Ignorance of valid explanations already put to you.


_____________________________________________________
AlexG:
Arguing with a crank - useless
__________________________________________________________________

It seems to me they get some orgasmic pleasure out of being able to tell themselves, they can think for themselves, Ignoring all that has gone before them.
No harm actually done though, as the established mainstream and society in general, ignore such rantings.
The status quo remains as is.
 
paddoboy said:
river's asked:
based on what evidence?
_________________________________________

You have been informed of the myriads of evidence for SMBH's many time.
Being in denial is sad.
___________________________________________
rivers said:
So far there is no sound theory that explains the galactic jets coming from , any galactic core
_________________________________________________________

Your denial problem has reared its ugly head again.
Again the polar jets have been explained to you.

_____________________________________________________________________
rivers said
As well , since a , BH , is a singularity , how is it that these , galactic jets , have , this energy spewing out from two opposite poles of the galaxy
__________________________________________________________________

More denial....more Ignorance of valid explanations already put to you.


_____________________________________________________
AlexG:
Arguing with a crank - useless
__________________________________________________________________

It seems to me they get some orgasmic pleasure out of being able to tell themselves, they can think for themselves, Ignoring all that has gone before them.
No harm actually done though, as the established mainstream and society in general, ignore such rantings.
The status quo remains as is.
Click to expand...

As I said

So hard reasoning and the following logic is " trolling "

I then also find the weak reasoning and the following logic , is " trolling " :)
 
rivers said:
So hard reasoning and the following logic is " trolling "
I then also find the weak reasoning and the following logic , is " trolling "
________________________________________________________

Ignoring the giants that have gone before you is certainly not logical.
Being fooled by self Gratuitous thoughts and delusions, and not being able to recognise when one is wrong is dumb.
 
paddoboy said:
rivers said:
So hard reasoning and the following logic is " trolling "
I then also find the weak reasoning and the following logic , is " trolling "
Click to expand...
________________________________________________________

Ignoring the giants that have gone before you is certainly not logical.
Being fooled by self Gratuitous thoughts and delusions, and not being able to recognise when one is wrong is dumb.
Click to expand...

Thing is that " giants " restrict your reasoning and logic

And None of these " giants " have said or implied they " know it all "

You have though pad , and thats your obvious mistake
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top