Possibility of star formation around black holes

Experiments and theories are developed from observations in many cases......
We see the anomalous angular momentum of the stars in the outer part of galaxies......we hypothesise DM.....we find more evidence supporting that hypothesis.....that now is accepted......
We observe accelerated expansion of space/time....we hypothesise DE.....research is currently being undertaken to enlighten us on the nature of this DE.

So far, what you have hypothesised is not just unlikely, it actually appears opposite to what we are observing.
That's why you are not being taken seriously, and your threads and comments could even slip from Älternative Theory" forum, to pseudoscience.

What equation was used to find these anomalies?
 
What equation was used to find these anomalies?


The anomalies were observed from the results of various data received from advanced technical Instruments like telescopes and space probes.......then the scientific method took over.
Do you have access to any of this equipment and data?
 
A change in direction is called...a change in direction?...adjusting the vector?...?
At any rate, a change in direction does not demand any change in speed.

That is correct, it would however be a change in velocity or in other words an acceleration. This is simply the definition of acceleration.
 
It[angular momentum] is applied to velocity [of photons] in electrodynamics.
Is angular momentum in electrodynamics the same or different than angular momentum in kinematics? How are they the same, or how are they different?

What's the formula that describes that deviation in trajectory as a function of angles of spin?
There is a bunch of them in the Einstein field equations and Schwarzchild solutions. Not many contain torque, time, and trajectory.
Does "trajectory" imply Euclidean space or curved space?

Angular momentum is the tangential component to lights velocity. Energy and momentum are the sin and cousin.:D
$$ {2{\pi}RF{\sin} {\theta}$$
What is the effect of a tangential component of 2πrf·sin(θ) on the trajectory of a photon in Euclidean space?
 
Is angular momentum in electrodynamics the same or different than angular momentum in kinematics? How are they the same, or how are they different?
In electrodynamics exchange of angular momentum is governed by gravity as opposed to two objects touching.
Does "trajectory" imply Euclidean space or curved space?
Curved.

What is the effect of a tangential component of 2πrf·sin(θ) on the trajectory of a photon in Euclidean space?
The object would spin more in higher gravity. In some instances lift or drag would alter the trajectory, but in open space there would be a negligible change.
 
An increase in speed is called acceleration.
A decrease in speed is called deceleration.

A change in direction is called...a change in direction?...adjusting the vector?...?
At any rate, a change in direction does not demand any change in speed.
That is correct, it would however be a change in velocity or in other words an acceleration. This is simply the definition of acceleration.

origin, velocity = speed.
Any change that results in an increase in velocity/speed is called acceleration.
Any change that results in a decrease in velocity/speed is called deceleration.

Any change in direction or vector does not demand a correlating change in velocity/speed.
 
origin, velocity = speed.
Any change that results in an increase in velocity/speed is called acceleration.
Any change that results in a decrease in velocity/speed is called deceleration.

Any change in direction or vector does not demand a correlating change in velocity/speed.

Good enough, the information is easily obtainable but you are free to believe whatever you want.
 
Good enough, the information is easily obtainable but you are free to believe whatever you want.

Good enough?

If the information is "easily obtainable", would you care to Post some of the "easily obtainable" proof that a decrease in velocity/speed is the "definition" of acceleration?
 
origin, velocity = speed.

This is wrong too.

Assume you start at point A and travel in a circle that has a perimeter of 50 miles and return to point A in 1 hour.

You average speed will be 50 mph

Your average velocity will be 0 mph

$$ 50 \neq 0 $$
 
The equation for angular momentum of a photon supplied by a force of gravity.

$${\frac{2{\pi}RF{\sin} {\theta}}{2{\pi}Gf{\cos} {\theta}}}$$

Where R is half the frequency.

Big F is angular momentum.

Gf is the force of gravity.
 
Sure, good luck with your investigation into understanding speed, velocity and acceleration.:shrug:

So...if a mass is moving at a velocity of 299,792,458 meters per second, and the velocity of that mass changes to 0.00 meters per second, is that change an example of acceleration?
 
The equation for angular momentum of a photon supplied by a force of gravity.

$${\frac{2{\pi}RF{\sin} {\theta}}{2{\pi}Gf{\cos} {\theta}}}$$

Where R is half the frequency.

Big F is angular momentum.

Gf is the force of gravity.

How can that be the equation for angular momentum if one of the variables in the equation is angular momentum?
 
Oops. (splat, followed by relentless windshield wiper action)


After you answer Origin be sure to tell us what theta is and what happened to its derivative.
 
How can that be the equation for angular momentum if one of the variables in the equation is angular momentum?

You can move variables around so angular momentum is equal to the other part and solve. Or you can solve it where it is at by skipping basic algebra. Btw the "2pi" part cancels but is good use of a visual for circumference.
 
Oops. (splat, followed by relentless windshield wiper action)


After you answer Origin be sure to tell us what theta is and what happened to its derivative.

As far as I know theta is an angle. Incorporating an (x,y) position is simple... my head is just spinning a bit at the moment. Perhaps you could help me out with that part Aqueous. Then ill do the rest.
 
Back
Top