Rick Geniale said:Why you are so convinced of our unreliability? If you are simply a skeptic, there are no problems.
I generally have a skeptical attitude towards people claiming they have done something truly brilliant, yet refuse to give any proof of it. So, indeed, I'm simply a skeptic.
For your information, in the history there has always been someone that has made something for the first time.
Yes, but with a project of this magnitude usually the work load is shared by a team of experts. You said it yourself:
For your information, a very deep knowledge is required to understand General Artificial Intelligence: knowledge about mathematics, logic, linguistics, psychology, cognitive psychology, computer science, etc.
To me, that implies you need experts from all those fields to make PIBOT work. Yet, you claim to be a one-man company? Or, are you very deeply knowledgeable in all those areas?
But, why you insist to make insinuations about our work?
I do not insist. I, and others, posted questions, all of which you have not answered concretely. From there on I speculated about the true status of your project.
What do you want we publish?
Patent numbers and some proof of results.
Our secrets?
No.
The software codes of PIBOT?
No.
Please, tell us who you are.
What good would that do? How does it relate to the issues raised in this thread?
Do you work for a company? Which company? Who pays you?
It suffices to say that the organisation I work for has no ambitions in the field you are active in.
Are you an AI researcher?
No.
Are you an AI expert?
I wouldn't call myself an expert, no. Yet, I do think that my background enables me to detect, on a broad scale, what's truly revolutionary in AI and what is not. You can find an English description dealing with the MSc program I've completed covering aspects of AI here.
Having said that, I'm not sure why you ask for my credentials since they are not at stake here. Yours obviously are. Do you have any recent published papers in scientific journals? I've Googled on your name (and a few variations like "R. Geniale", etc) and was unable to find anything related to AI, except for a reference to another forum where you have started a similar thread. For those interested in the comments on that forum, you can read them here.
Are you a futurologist?
No.
Or, more banally, you are envy.
If you succeed, I'll metaphorically drown in my own envy, yes.
If you are truly interested in our work/products/technology, then contact us privately by e-mail telling us who you are and what do you want from us.
There is no need to contact you privately. You made a public statement on a public forum. I posted public comments on that statement. It only seems natural that if you have something to add other than what you have written above, that you should do it in the same public arena.
Otherwise, I will not reply anymore to your posts.
As you wish.