If we do an energy balance, we know, from direct observation, only the car received the needed energy for the acceleration. The person at the starting line did not receive any.
This is not true in the reference frame of the car. In that frame, there was a pseudoforce acting on the person at the starting line that caused that person to accelerate and which provided the required kinetic energy.
The relative reference assumption violates the energy balance of each reference, since it takes way energy from one reference and creates it in another reference. This is the beauty of it, since this allows perpeual motion.
Wrong on both counts.
If we assume reference was relative, we can turn the stationary person into a perpetual motion machine; Without any energy, the stationary reference will magically gain teleported energy so we can have a person moving at 100kmsec.
Meaningless nonsense.
We could also make use of hybrid technology to store the X amount of perpetual motion energy into a battery, etc. Or we can convert this to dark energy.
Stop making stuff up. Nobody knows how to convert anything to dark energy - least of all you.
If we needed more energy, all we need to do is get the person in the car to open their eyes wider, beyond the person at the starting line. They need to also look at all the other race cars that are parked nearby. We can multiply the energy in the moving car (real energy balance) into the perpetual motion energy of dozens of moving cars. With this energy amplification we can solve the world's energy problems.
If you insist on posting complete crap like this, I think we may have to ban you from the forum.