OG proposal #1 (June 09) - Cull worthless members?

Should we go ahead and remove useless members?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 10 38.5%

  • No.

    Votes: 9 34.6%

  • Abstain.

    Votes: 7 26.9%
  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
^^ Cluelusshusband is another perfect example of someone who's remarkable potential is being wasted in this environment, we can't let talent like this slip through the cracks, it's unconscionable.
 
takandjive said:
Know what, boys? I told you precisely why I'm fine with it until you start saying, "Well, so-n-so didn't need a warning because s/he knows," but someone runs their mouth about molesting a girl, and you simply warn them.

James, in response to, "Well, you wouldn't like it if you got banned without warning," if I was talking about molesting underaged people, I kind of expect it.

I guess being "fair" holds most important above all else when it comes to child molestation. Wouldn't want to be unfair and just outright ban him for an unsolicited PM about fingering a young girl. We never said that wasn't okay.

As I told you earlier: I don't want to tell you how to do your job. I want you to do it. I don't want to be a mod. I want you to use your brain. I consider it part of your job to keep people who commit sex crimes that almost all people agree are atrocious off the boards.

And that is absolutely all I have to say, now or ever with regard to you, James.
Click to expand...

Its an example of following guidelines and and using common sense ESPECIALLY on a board that attracts people of all age groups not just adults
 
Dr Lou Natic said:
This forum is stupidly uptight, no one should ever take the internet as seriously as it is taken on sciforums.
Click to expand...
NIST,FEMA, and NSF seem to take their shit seriously, you don't see people running around on their sites like *censored*.
All this effort put in to make sciforums "mature" ultimately comes across as extremely immature.
Click to expand...
or extremely jealous on your part.
This is an internet forum, not a courtroom, it exists for entertainment purposes, it should be silly, it should be filled with outlandish comments from strange people that are ridiculous, absurd, inappropriate, overtly offensive, etc, inflammatory, so as to ignite vigorous and hopefully entertaining discussions.
Click to expand...
i'll agree . . . with the vigorous and entertaining discussions.
 
Dr Lou Natic said:
^^ Cluelusshusband is another perfect example of someone who's remarkable potential is being wasted in this environment, we can't let talent like this slip through the cracks, it's unconscionable.
Click to expand...
bullshit.
what's their point? to mock the site?
if that's the case then they could very well be responsible for this scenario you loath so much.
 
leopold99 said:
NIST,FEMA, and NSF seem to take their shit seriously, you don't see people running around on their sites like *censored*.

or extremely jealous on your part.

i'll agree . . . with the vigorous and entertaining discussions.
Click to expand...

I second all these sentiments.
 
glaucon said:
I second all these sentiments.
Click to expand...

I agree.!!!

PS
New rule suggeston:::

When ever we agree wit what somone said we shud make a post that only contanes such words as... "I agree"... or... "I second what you said"... or "I second all these sentiments"... ect.!!!
 
I wish to report the recent post by Cluelesshusband wherein he stated "I agree", then shattered the new rule (Constrained Repetition of Approving Posts) by including many more words.
 
You know what, we've had to endure all these lame ass posts from James lately... I think his punishment should be to resurrect the MS Paint picture thread and UNDELETE all the "offensive" (and most funny) posts and pictures in it.
 
Lucysnow said:
Because many people continue to interact with him.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I've been telling a particular group of people to put eachother on "ignore" for about three months now.

Do you know why they don't? For the same reason why you see arch-enemies NEVER destroy/ignore eachother: Because they secretly like the other one.

In this case they want the "enemy" to stay so that they can vanquish them. But this is just a forum, and people have eons to formulate a response, inevitably come up with a reply and never give up. The fight then degrades into mush. I've been there myself. It never ends, and that's why I tell myself, "It's just a forum, people aren't really going to change..."

~String
 
superstring01 said:
Exactly. I've been telling a particular group of people to put eachother on "ignore" for about three months now.

Do you know why they don't? For the same reason why you see arch-enemies NEVER destroy/ignore eachother: Because they secretly like the other one.

In this case they want the "enemy" to stay so that they can vanquish them. But this is just a forum, and people have eons to formulate a response, inevitably come up with a reply and never give up. The fight then degrades into mush. I've been there myself. It never ends, and that's why I tell myself, "It's just a forum, people aren't really going to change..."

~String
Click to expand...

If you truly believe that I got an alien to sell you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top