-=-
WHO truly believes you got an alien to sell???
WHO truly believes you got an alien to sell???
OG proposal #1 (June 09) - Cull worthless members?
- Thread starter James R
- Start date
- Status
i got connections with the local hardware store. ( its a joke people)
-=-
It flew over your head.
It flew over your head.
I vote ripleofdeath and cluelusshusband. I think most other members would agree and I fail to see why they haven't been culled already. Although you could argue that ripleofdeath adds some entertainment value to the site, his constant preaching to me about how I am going to die painfully and alone is starting to get a little tiresome 
I vote ripleofdeath and cluelusshusband. I think most other members would agree and I fail to see why they haven't been culled already. Although you could argue that ripleofdeath adds some entertainment value to the site, his constant preaching to me about how I am going to die painfully and alone is starting to get a little tiresome
oK a joke is a joke but i thank thats 3 voats for me... 2 mor an i coud be baned.!!!
PS
This is proof that somtimes a joke can go to far.!!! :grumble:
Mrs.Lucysnow
Valued Senior Member
The complaining lot.
The poll is closed.
It looks like members are divided as to whether anybody here is "useless" enough to deserve a ban. Nevertheless, we have a narrow vote in favour of banning people.
As stated in the opening post, 5 nominations were needed for any member to be put up for a ban vote.
Looking through the thread, 8 members have been named as candidates for banning. Lou Natic, as you would expect, has also suggested that all moderators (or at least administrators) be removed as useless members.
The greatest number of people mentioning any particular poster, however, is three, which is not enough for anybody to be put up for a formal banning vote according to the current proposal.
This proposal is therefore now closed.
I thank the membership for a useful discussion of the issue.
It looks like members are divided as to whether anybody here is "useless" enough to deserve a ban. Nevertheless, we have a narrow vote in favour of banning people.
As stated in the opening post, 5 nominations were needed for any member to be put up for a ban vote.
Looking through the thread, 8 members have been named as candidates for banning. Lou Natic, as you would expect, has also suggested that all moderators (or at least administrators) be removed as useless members.
The greatest number of people mentioning any particular poster, however, is three, which is not enough for anybody to be put up for a formal banning vote according to the current proposal.
This proposal is therefore now closed.
I thank the membership for a useful discussion of the issue.
- Status