Well, Roger Penrose. There may be reference to this in his book ''Shadows of the Mind.''
There is also reference to Roger Penroses comments in the award winning book 'Yoga of Time Travel', which is of course written by Dr Wolf.
It is argued that there is no proof the mind is any phenomenon of the brain, nor is there any proof the mind exists in any sort of time and space.
(I believe, as do a few scientists, that the mind somehow is time). If it is time, then real focal points, such as collapsing the state of a system, is surely a physical phenomenon being created upon a measurement? We can disturb and create the universe, including the indformation in the universe, and thoughts may very well add detail, that we aren't normally aware of, and far too discrete to probably even be measured. We may very well find that thoughts on a system, determine a system in a statistical way. This was also highlighted by Heisenberg, in musings of his concerning ''mindless ramblings created things.''
And no, the latter theory using conjugate waves was introduced by Dr Cramer, and the two-time measurement hypothesis by Susan D'Amato, among two other physicists.
But suffice to say, Wolf also models his thoughts on the transactional interpretation.
Actually, in the scientific mainstream, not so much the media or public, he is considered Hawking's nemesis.
No!!!!! He models them from a strictly scientific acceptance of probable metaphysical viewpoints. He is however sometimes critisized for not destinguishing the two, but nonetheless, he is a living genious.
Somehow, I don't think Hawking is shaking in his wheelchair.
Metaphysics is the study of reality based on creative human ideas and how they make you feel. In other words it's not really a study of reality. Mixing metaphysics with science is a great way to accomplish, discover, and apply nothing.
He should. Unlike Penrose, he has made a great deal of errors that have been exposed over the last few year. But then again, i follow what's happeneing quite a lot.
You do realize sweety, you just spoke an oxymoron...???
Not only is he not perfect, like tha rest of us, he has made some academic shameful mistakes, which will discredit him in the future. Guaranteed.
No, that's not what i meant. You said:
''Metaphysics is the study of reality based on creative human ideas and how they make you feel. In other words it's not really a study of reality.''
The only reality at large, is the one we observe,...
...and that is even created inside the mind.
This is irrefutable.
So metaphysics is related, and that was why your sentance contradicted itself.
I thought I'd start a thread to focus key observations made about the dream world. I believe that there is a strong possibility that when we die we enter the dream worlds/realms.