Nucleus to the universe?

[trevor borocz johnson]

Colour is the perception by the eye of certain frequency ranges of radiation.

everything in your eye is heat, atoms molecules When organized a certain way it interprets light which is heat.

Green and blue shirts can be at the same temperature in my cupboard.

white shirts reflect light better and black absorbs light, darker colors will get hotter then lighter.

No, energy is not a wave. Energy is the capacity to do work.

well exchemist I guess we could delve into different types of energy, that might take awhile I've only been on about the heat as medium since last December. Before that I was an aetherist of my own invention.

 

[DaveC426913]

everything in your eye is heat, atoms molecules

Not true.

When organized a certain way it interprets light which is heat.

Not true.

 

[trevor borocz johnson]

A magnet is like a fan where two fans facing each other would push each other apart just as two north ends of a magnet do. The medium for the magnet is heat and it circulates heat through en enclosed system in a one way direction. The magnet doesn't heat up just like a fan doesn't heat up because of the air it circulates. Using a perpetual motion machine where two fans are facing opposing each other you could build a mechanical circuit just like an AC circuit.

 

[Beaconator]

A magnet is like a fan where two fans facing each other would push each other apart just as two north ends of a magnet do. The medium for the magnet is heat and it circulates heat through en enclosed system in a one way direction. The magnet doesn't heat up just like a fan doesn't heat up because of the air it circulates. Using a perpetual motion machine where two fans are facing opposing each other you could build a mechanical circuit just like an AC circuit.

Our best ideas of heat can easily be described in Celsius. There is no maximum or minimum. Yet zero is where crystals form. Therefore heat is a one way street and an estimated quantity.

it takes heat from pressure to create the universe and cause fusion. Neutrons are just one type of particle that has enough space between its center to play against the gravity of another object.

 

[DaveC426913]

Nope, nope, nope and nope.
Have you considered a career in politics? Or a used car dealership?

 

[James R]

A magnet is like a fan where two fans facing each other would push each other apart just as two north ends of a magnet do.

Are you saying that a magnetic is "like" a fan only to the extent that a repulsive force can be observed for both the fan and the magnetic if circumstances are right.

That's an extraordinarily weak comparison you're making, there.

The medium for the magnet is heat and it circulates heat through en enclosed system in a one way direction.

Please explain, with reference to the relevant physics, how "heat" can cause magnetism.

What led you to that conclusion?

Using a perpetual motion machine where two fans are facing opposing each other you could build a mechanical circuit just like an AC circuit.

There are no perpetual motion machines.

In what way would your "fan circuit" be like an AC circuit? Please explain, with reference to the relevant physics.

Thank you.

 

[James R]

Our best ideas of heat can easily be described in Celsius. There is no maximum or minimum.

You are wrong. There is a minimum Celcius temperature.

Yet zero is where crystals form.

What are you talking about? Are you okay?

Therefore heat is a one way street and an estimated quantity.

What are you talking about?

it takes heat from pressure to create the universe and cause fusion.

Explain, with reference to relevant physics, how pressure causes "heat".

Please start by defining "heat" clearly.

Neutrons are just one type of particle that has enough space between its center to play against the gravity of another object.

That thought is unconnected to what went before.

Look, Beaconator, you're clearly not in any state to be attempting to post science on an internet forum right now. Please take care of yourself and seek the help you need. What you're doing at the moment is not helping you.

 

[exchemist]

You are wrong.

Look, Beaconator, you're clearly not in any state to be attempting to post science on an internet forum right now. Please take care of yourself and seek the help you need. What you're doing at the moment is not helping you.

Exactly.

 

[trevor borocz johnson]

Please explain, with reference to the relevant physics, how "heat" can cause magnetism.

What led you to that conclusion?

For one I don't know what magic world you live in but everything in my world is made of heat infinitely. Heat is the medium of space and a magnet's medium is space-heat. The heat creates a one way flow on space-heat and is undetectable by temperature, its only evidence is when the completely obvious nature off the magnet creates a push and a pull like a fan.

In what way would your "fan circuit" be like an AC circuit? Please explain, with reference to the relevant physics.

When you spin a magnet in a generator it alternates its N and S sides and the 'push and pull' creates the jumping back and forth of electron between atoms that create the AC circuit. If you created a circuit of balls or liquid or even air and you spun a fan so it's push and pull alternate on the circuit of balls you could transfer energy without heat loss using a mechanical AC circuit. More evidence that a magnet is like a fan as well.

 

[exchemist]

For one I don't know what magic world you live in but everything in my world is made of heat infinitely. Heat is the medium of space and a magnet's medium is space-heat. The heat creates a one way flow on space-heat and is undetectable by temperature, its only evidence is when the completely obvious nature off the magnet creates a push and a pull like a fan.



When you spin a magnet in a generator it alternates its N and S sides and the 'push and pull' creates the jumping back and forth of electron between atoms that create the AC circuit. If you created a circuit of balls or liquid or even air and you spun a fan so it's push and pull alternate on the circuit of balls you could transfer energy without heat loss using a mechanical AC circuit. More evidence that a magnet is like a fan as well.

Well, there certainly seems to a surfeit of balls going on here, if not a circuit.

 

[DaveC426913]

For one I don't know what magic world you live in but everything in my world is made of heat infinitely. Heat is the medium of space and a magnet's medium is space-heat. The heat creates a one way flow on space-heat and is undetectable by temperature, its only evidence is when the completely obvious nature off the magnet creates a push and a pull like a fan.

Nope, nope, nope.
Nope, nope, nope.
Aaannnnd ... (carry the one...) nope.

Congratulations. You have created a post that is entirely comprised of false things.

 

[trevor borocz johnson]

Well, there certainly seems to a surfeit of balls going on here, if not a circuit.

just wait til I get to the exam.

 

[James R]

trevor:

For one I don't know what magic world you live in but everything in my world is made of heat infinitely.

Define "heat" for me, please.

Heat is the medium of space and a magnet's medium is space-heat.

How can we detect this medium of space? What equipment should we use?

The heat creates a one way flow on space-heat and is undetectable by temperature...

Is it detectable by anything?

... its only evidence is when the completely obvious nature off the magnet creates a push and a pull like a fan.

So you're telling me that you can't actually connect your concept of "heat" to magnetism using any actual physics. Is that correct?

This is all just your imagination? Or are you just looking for somebody to pay attention to you?

When you spin a magnet in a generator it alternates its N and S sides and the 'push and pull' creates the jumping back and forth of electron between atoms that create the AC circuit.

That's not quite right.

If you created a circuit of balls or liquid or even air and you spun a fan so it's push and pull alternate on the circuit of balls you could transfer energy without heat loss using a mechanical AC circuit.

Without heat loss?

Please explain to me why there would be no heat loss. Make sure you explain in terms of any relevant physics, this time.

 

[trevor borocz johnson]

Define "heat" for me, please.

Heat is the background of the universe. Every type of heat is a squeezing density on this background. There is only one medium and that is heat.

How can we detect this medium of space? What equipment should we use?

Everything has to be made of one background medium though wouldn't you agree? It only makes sense that the background is a quality that everything has which is some amount of heat/gravity that holds it at its temperature even if that -273.13 celsius it could still be colder and there has to be some heat or the temperature would plumit.

Without heat loss?

Please explain to me why there would be no heat loss. Make sure you explain in terms of any relevant physics, this time.

Air and water have very little friction, the lighter overall mass of the circuit be it air or other is going to dramatically improve your efficiency of the alternating fan. If the circuit is made of heavy balls then your going to use all your fan energy moving the balls just a little, I thinkk..

 

[James R]

Heat is the background of the universe. Every type of heat is a squeezing density on this background. There is only one medium and that is heat.

There's your problem, right there.

If you can't define "heat" in a coherent way, then any claims you make about it can only be coherent by accident.

When I ask you to define what heat is, your response is just to reel off some more of your beliefs about what heat does.

Inventing a new synonym doesn't help, either. Whether you call it "heat" or "the background of the universe" or a doesn't make any difference, until you can define those terms in a coherent way.

Everything has to be made of one background medium though wouldn't you agree?

No.

It only makes sense that ...

You should try starting few sentence with "It only makes sense that..."

Having a one-track mind is limiting. Try to work with multiple competing hypotheses. You can't know in advance what the best explanation for something will be. Lots of things can make sense. The problem is to figure out which one of them is correct.

Air and water have very little friction, the lighter overall mass of the circuit be it air or other is going to dramatically improve your efficiency of the alternating fan. If the circuit is made of heavy balls then your going to use all your fan energy moving the balls just a little, I thinkk..

You didn't answer the question I asked you. You have not referred to any relevant physics. This is a waste of time.

 

[trevor borocz johnson]

There's your problem, right there.

If you can't define "heat" in a coherent way, then any claims you make about it can only be coherent by accident.

When I ask you to define what heat is, your response is just to reel off some more of your beliefs about what heat does.

Inventing a new synonym doesn't help, either. Whether you call it "heat" or "the background of the universe" or a doesn't make any difference, until you can define those terms in a coherent way.

Pretty simple idea. I 'm not sure I'm the one with the problem if you can't comprehend it.

Having a one-track mind is limiting. Try to work with multiple competing hypotheses. You can't know in advance what the best explanation for something will be. Lots of things can make sense. The problem is to figure out which one of them is correct.

Again not sure its my problem at this point that you can't understand. I wrote the OP simple enough for a 10 year old to understand.

You didn't answer the question I asked you. You have not referred to any relevant physics. This is a waste of time.

Thanks for responding! and oh! not!

 

[DaveC426913]

Pretty simple idea. I 'm not sure I'm the one with the problem if you can't comprehend it.

Indeed.
Pixie dust is pretty simple to comprehend too. That's not the problem. The problem is that it has no basis in fact. It's just a fanciful idea.

 

[trevor borocz johnson]

Here's a picture from 2016 that is still accurate with my theory of heat at a standstill. My arguement from back then was and still is true. If you look at Einstein's famous experiment of gravity on a sheet of fabric, and you look at it from the topview, which is the only correct view because it is in line with the plane of gravity beneath the fabric, or else doesn't work at all, then it looks the same as my picture of heat/density on space time causing gravity. A lot of people use the side view of 'bending' but this view is as useful as the bottom view. Only the top view is correct.

 

[DaveC426913]

Doodles aren't science.

I think you're missing the point here. Just because you have an idea doesn't mean it's worth sharing. So far, it has no basis in the facts the rest of us know already.

For example if I showed you a picture of pixie dust as part of my "pixie universe" idea, would that somehow convince you that pixie dust is real?

 

[Michael 345]

would that somehow convince you that pixie dust is real?

If was anything like the out of focus blurred images of UFOs, no