A proof requires some axioms assumed to be true & some logical arguments based on those axioms.
The axioms required for proving or disproving the existence of god are undoubtedly biased by the agenda of the person presenting the proof.
Issues like the existence of a god or gods & many other non-scientific notions are not provable or dis-provable.
Logic/science & religious belief are not compatible. Due to cultural context, some scientists claim to have religious beliefs. This must require the 1984 novel’s concept of DoubleThink.
BTW: Various words/terms used in the axioms of a logical system must be viewed as undefined primitive words/terms.
The axioms required for proving or disproving the existence of god are undoubtedly biased by the agenda of the person presenting the proof.
Issues like the existence of a god or gods & many other non-scientific notions are not provable or dis-provable.
Logic/science & religious belief are not compatible. Due to cultural context, some scientists claim to have religious beliefs. This must require the 1984 novel’s concept of DoubleThink.
BTW: Various words/terms used in the axioms of a logical system must be viewed as undefined primitive words/terms.