Congratulations to all those who think they've won something or another in this topic. At this time I would like to reiterate in a more general context that the 9/11 Truth movement doesn't seem to be much about truth itself, but rather the egotism of its players.
Let's start with a concession to the Truth movement:
Let us imagine that the towers were brought down by carefully-placed detonations. Let us pretend that, in the words of one CNBC presenter, the question is how they did it.
The hijackers/pilots did not need to know that the buildings would be detonated.
The demolitions crew did not need to know that the buildings would be hit by a plane.
I raise these points because the argument against the official story seems to have two components that theorists try to cram into one:
(1) The official story is wrong
(2) The U.S. government is guilty
I have
no doubt whatsoever that the official story is wrong. It
always is at this scale. The question is
how wrong. And another:
Who is actually guilty?
Accepting point #1 does not require acceptance of point #2. The United States government's guilt in what happened on 9/11 can still be viewed as incompetence, negligence, &c.
Someone please, preferably a conspiracy theorist, sketch me a simple picture of 9/11 starting with one simple term:
BCCI.
Just try it. I know it's not as simple as "Bush + Israel = 9/11", but at the very least you'll have some morbid fun.