W4U,
I agree, but are we evolving in a balanced way?
Sorry, I forgot the question mark in the original post. It was a question, not a statement.
What does that mean?
IMO, there lies the problem. Many species evolved senses well beyond our own brain ability, but only in very specific ways, for a specific function in their environment.
OK
How are we accelerating our brain power? Do you mean we are accelerating the rate of attaining knowledge?
I think we are becoming wiser, but we have a long, long way to go.
I agree.
Replace "accelerating" with "evolution" of brain power. I am sure you agree that our brains are not perfect and need further growth and/or refinement. But brain power is directly proportional to brain size and sophistication of neural network functions.
Thus we can grow larger skulls (greater volume), which presents additional problems for the female in childbirth, or the brain needs to acquire more folding to increase internal processing power.
The latter seems more efficient.
Attaining knowledge does not make us smarter or wiser. IMO, we are indeed accelerating in attaining knowledge, it is an exponential function. But I think we are in agreement that storing data does not make us smarter or wiser, only more kowledgeable (a double edged sword).
Bottom line, our brains have by no means attained optimum functionality. Optical illusions are proof of its limitations and some choices we made were very "unwise" as is becoming obvious.
I think we are in fundamental agreement, but our language is somewhat "confounded".