If you're honestly a snookered soul, then obviously by way of pointing out mistakes of others as based upon being snookered isn't making you a liar, just thoroughly dumbfounded, like I was as of a little over three years ago. Unfortunately for the likes of "badastronomy", they claim NOT being snookered, and instead they come off as "all knowing" about absolutely everything, much like yourself.
BTW AD1;
If you'd produce something of a positive statement, thereby conjuring up some specific numbers, as then we'd have something to argue about. Please check back through your own post and realize that you yourself have not contributed squat, though plenty of flak on behalf of protecting those dogs. Whereas I've given the links of Kodak data files, and of a short search for key words such as: KODAK UV Spectrum, those came up with dozens if not hundreds of perfectly good stuff.
If you were on my tail before, as I suspect it stands to reason, that there too you were using a phony name, thus folks like yourself do not count because, you don't really exist, or perhaps the name is being moderated by many that I have no way of knowing about (phony names seem to do those sorts of things).
Once again; it's not that I can so much prove or disprove upon what's to be seen as captured within the various moonscape and/or of whatever apollo related stuff, as it's the spectrum of color skew or shift that's entirely bogus.
And, it's not even about whatever manual corrections that could have been applied during the print (negative to paper or even from a positive transparency to internegative and then onto photo paper) process of creating said photos for the public to view. However, the amount of correction would not only have been easily detected but, as such the very need as to having to accommodate with such efforts would have been the absolute right sort of thing as for team NASA/Apollo to have shown the before and after correcting image, as with and without spectrum skew results.
These days, an actual digital scan (8192 dpi) file could be offered of the raw negative or transparency, in addition to offering those before and after correction prints.
Thus the "proof positive" indeed becomes the Kodak moment, that simply hasn't passed the test of such being originally recorded as upon the moon, whereas the raw solar amount of near-UV and UV/a as recorded by the Kodak yellow photo emulsion dye should have been greatly if not over-saturated to say the least, that is unless the other visible portions were significantly under-exposed, of which that simply wasn't the case.
And ever since NASA/Apollo have long proven their expertise in applied multiple interneagtives in order to assemble a bogus print, and re-prints as such, we can't trust those prints, and as such only the raw negatives will have to do.
Fore knowing the original spectrum of the red, white and blue flag elements is also offering "proof positive" as for that of any B&W film, of which said film is indeed highly sensitive to the near-UV and UV/a spectrums, of which the lunar environment affords lots of such spectrum as opposed to hardly any as provided from the likes of xenon illumination. Thus this time the damn glove fits, and case closed.
So, this is much like catching a very bloated fox with chicken feathers still sticking out of his mouth, and of all the remaining chickens cowering as far away from that fox as possible, as such it doesn't take the likes of Colonel Sanders in order to figure out what the hell just transpired.
KODAK UV Spectrum: B&W and Color Sensitivity and Spectral Sensitivity
Though I have some older B&W as well as color spectra data sets, offering original hard copy data that's similar if not identical to the most recent Kodak spectra info, I'm still reasonably confidant that your NASA/Apollo bible offers all the right answerers, so why don't you keep pulling out one after another of those smoke and mirror answers from their magic hat, so that you and others can respond to my research, or perhaps you'll still need to go for something within Kodak corporate?
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-photo-entro.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-apollohoax.htm