I must concur not merely because I find it well placed in target but in that speculation is an endless pursuit and those aspiring only to speculation...or should I say speculation without the limits of facts is not intrested in truth...but justifying for the sake of offering a differing arguement.
Speculation is supposed to help weed out other possibilities.
After which a comparison is necessary. If there is not viable support fro such speculation then it is unfounded and should be discarded.
That is a process of elimination that many scientist and amatuer scientist are ignoring. They are allowing an adopted belief system to sway the course of the art of deduction.
Religion, of course, being an adopted belief system which is entirely neutral and encourages critical analysis.
What exactly do you mean by "allowing an adopted belief system to sway the course of the art of deduction" ? A few examples of what you have in mind would help