Yes, I can see the issue. But I didn't make up the meaning of any words I basically defined.
But you did cherry-pick from the definitions offered so as to suit your agenda.
Disbelief, from wiktionary:
- Unpreparedness, unwillingness, or inability to believe that something is the case.
She cried out in disbelief on hearing that terrorists had crashed an airplane into the World Trade Center in New York City.
- Astonishment.
I stared in disbelief at the Grand Canyon.
- The loss or abandonment of a belief; cessation of belief.
Even if you type Disbelief into Google, as you have suggested, then you find that, despite your claims to the contrary, you have edited the definition - through omission of alternatives.
Hence the accusation of cherry-picking.
I guess you disbelieve that you were indeed cherry-picking, don't you.
To wit:
disbelief
dɪsbɪˈliːf/
noun
noun:
disbelief
inability or refusal to accept that something is true or real.
"Laura shook her head in disbelief"
synonyms:incredulity, incredulousness, lack of belief, lack of credence, lack of conviction, scepticism, doubt, doubtfulness, dubiety, dubiousness, questioning, cynicism, suspicion, distrust, mistrust, wariness, chariness;More
bewilderment, bafflement, surprise, shock, stupefaction, confusion, perplexity
"she stared at him in disbelief"
antonyms:belief, credence
lack of faith.
"I'll burn in hell for disbelief"
synonyms:atheism, unbelief, godlessness, ungodliness, impiety, irreligion, agnosticism, nihilism
"I'll burn in hell for disbelief"
Thus you have clearly omitted the notion that disbelief is "lack of faith".
Note that with this definition there is no requirement that the faith that is lacked be in something that is true or real.
The practical is by necessity a digital position: you either act as though God exists or you act as though God does not exist.
The intellectual position allows for the entire spectrum between certainty of existence to certainty of non-existence, including the position of it being unknown.
If you only deliberately look at the practical position you are deliberately ignoring what the person says and argues and instead go only with how it manifests.
And when the manifestation is a digital proposition you might therefore get a distorted view of their position.
It is like when you vote in an election when there are only 2 parties - you can either vote for one of them (call them A and B) or you can not vote, or you can deliberately spoil your paper.
But if you vote for A does that mean that you agree with everything that A stands for?
Your
practical position is that you agree with them.
Your
intellectual position is that probably they offer the best alternative from the choices.
If you only judge someone's intellectual position by their practical then, as exampled, you will misunderstand them.
You seem to have a special meaning for the words I defined, that only apply to atheists such as yourself.
No, I just don't cherry-pick but apply the one that is clearly relevant - you know, the one about faith.
Those are aspects that describe God, but that's not what you need to know, in order to accept that God Is.
This is another issue with your argument: you think that only those that believe in God can know God.
And thus if you don't believe in God you can not know God.
Because to know God is to believe in God.
It is a circular argument, Jan.
None of these account for Sideshowbob's assumption that awareness of God, is the same as awareness of sun-eating dragons. Sideshowbob's assumption merely accentuate his atheism.
Yes, one option does:
3) God does not exist and the theist is simply mistaken in the way they interpret their experiences and belief,...
Just as a claimed awareness of sun-eating dragons would be a mistaken interpretation of the person's experiences... - and I'll leave you to join the dots.
I've said nothing wrong Baldeee.
You insult the agnostic atheist position by asserting through implication that they know God exists but willfully choose to reject the reality of it.
You do this through your claim of that "lack of belief" implies that the belief is in something real.
You do it through your application of "disbelief" to mean that it is the rejection of something true or real, rather than apply the more apt definition (that you willfully ignored) that it is simply the lack of faith.
Whether you consider what you do insulting or not, it is.
And you don't get to choose what others find insulting.
From Wikipedia...
Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of
belief in the existence of
deities.
[1][2][3][4] Less broadly, atheism is the rejection of belief that any deities exist.
[5][6] In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.
[1][2][7][8] Atheism is contrasted with
theism,
[9][10] which, in its most general form, is the belief that
at least one deity exists.
[10][11][12]...
Would you say that the broadest term describes your atheism?
Yes.