Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Well my new religion is Potentialism.
Instead of using the statement, "the unchanging, eternal, self-existent God," the "I am that I am," I use the statement, "the dynamical, eternal, self-existent Potential", the "I am that which may become Reality".
I find it remarkable that God refers to himself as "that", and not "who" or what" , but leaves it undefined.
At least I can defend my religion on scientific grounds, which, IMO, gives me an advantage over all other Theisms.
Instead of using the statement, "the unchanging, eternal, self-existent God," the "I am that I am," I use the statement, "the dynamical, eternal, self-existent Potential", the "I am that which may become Reality".
I find it remarkable that God refers to himself as "that", and not "who" or what" , but leaves it undefined.
At least I can defend my religion on scientific grounds, which, IMO, gives me an advantage over all other Theisms.
Last edited: