kx000
Valued Senior Member
That is a simple explenation. I can here thoughts in my head, and so can you.
How do you that they were not your thoughts but your girlfriends thoughts whom you were thinking of at the same time?
My journey from Atheism To Belief in God.
- Thread starter kwhilborn
- Start date
That is a simple explenation. I can here thoughts in my head, and so can you.
How do you that they were not your thoughts but your girlfriends thoughts whom you were thinking of at the same time?
Well how do you know that they were not your thoughts but your girlfriend's thoughts, whom you were thinking of at the same time?
So whose thoughts were they? You were thinking of your girlfriend. That sounds plausible. Nothing wrong with that. So while you are thinking of your Girlfriend you think you hear her voice in your mind.
I imagine it is possible to remember your girlfriends voice. But you are saying that these thought aren't yours but your girlfriend's?????
So how does her thoughts enter into your head? Surely this is not normal?
Kwhill, are you willing to reject this test if there is a good reason for doing so?
That's important, because otherwise it is faith, not science, and if you want to have a faith there are better things to believe in than this.
I mentioned this to you before on another thread.
There are visual clues which indicate the right answer. Nothing to do with intuition.
I can spot a circle every time.
In the cycle of images, two straight lines appear briefly about one third of the way down the box.
Perhaps other people could do the test and just look for circles using this clue.
I'm sure that if I persevered, I could spot all the shapes every time.
You are wasting your time on this.
Best to admit it and do something else.
Before you answer my previous post, maybe it would be best for you to let other people try the test, and maybe try it again yourself using the visual clues which I proposed.
Test is at http://www.choicedowsing.com/mind_research_institute/intuitivepractice/colorpage.php
Remember to press the "click here for next question" to change the test shapes.
Kwhill, I'm not trying to make a fool of you.
I can see you have spent considerable time on this.
But you are wasting your time.
Test is at http://www.choicedowsing.com/mind_research_institute/intuitivepractice/colorpage.php
Remember to press the "click here for next question" to change the test shapes.
Kwhill, I'm not trying to make a fool of you.
I can see you have spent considerable time on this.
But you are wasting your time.
So that pattern playing over the hidden shape is not random? It would be interesting to know whether Kwhill made it random or some random loop.
At times when working with computer generated randomness the computer seems to follow previous results so you could get these patterns even thought it was programmed to be random. So what you see may be the artefact of your computer?
I was also wondering if there was a way of recognising the pattern.
I think. Could be contradicted.
That it is a series of patterns generated by those old magic-eye 3D programs.
Try it yourself and see if you can recognise the Circle.
Maybe I'm just super intuitive. Try it:
Test is at http://www.choicedowsing.com/mind_re.../colorpage.php
As I said before:
Remember to press the "click here for next question" to change the test shapes.
As the boxes go through their sequences, for a very brief time you will see a pair of straight lines separated by a small gap. That's a circle. Try it a few times and see if you can get it every time.
That it is a series of patterns generated by those old magic-eye 3D programs.
Try it yourself and see if you can recognise the Circle.
Maybe I'm just super intuitive. Try it:
Test is at http://www.choicedowsing.com/mind_re.../colorpage.php
As I said before:
Remember to press the "click here for next question" to change the test shapes.
As the boxes go through their sequences, for a very brief time you will see a pair of straight lines separated by a small gap. That's a circle. Try it a few times and see if you can get it every time.
@ Captain Kremmen,
This is only for practising intuition, and has absolutely nothing to do with PSI research or testing.
If you do not focus on the test (or notice lines halfway down), then people are getting the answers from their subconscious.
There is no image OVER the image. It is an auto-stereo-gram depth file.
(click here)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostereogram
(stay on that site until you can see the shapes inside those.)
Intuition does not mean getting answers from god or some supernatural force. I believe intuition is simply relying on your subconscious for choices.
It is not random. It is a loop (animated gig)
If you are noticing lines in the "circle" drawing that "give it away" I could fix this by also making the circle drawings I use random. There are 8 different auto-stereo-grams inside that circle animate gif so some efforts were made to stop visual recognition.
The computer does not follow previous results. There are only 3 shapes used so the odds are one in 3 you will have the same shape on the top or the bottom, and even greater that this will apply for one of the 2. They are most assuredly completely random.
Attempting to visually recognize them, or focussing on them if you understand how to focus on auto-stereo-grams, is actually considered cheating for this kind of test. You are supposed to rely on the information conveyed to your subconscious.
I have described how I could fix this test so you would never "recognize" them. I am not prepared to change them or improve upon them.
If you can even THINK OF ANY better test IN THE WORLD that allows you to use your intuition, I would happily withdraw my statement that this is the only method in the world to practise your intuition.
I also have 2 other methods of this test.
a) use a color imperceptibly different from the background color for shapes.
b) use u.v. ink or a color just outside perception to color the shapes.
I stand by my tests as the only method in the world for practising your intuition. I really do not want this thread to be about that though as it is off topic.
This is only for practising intuition, and has absolutely nothing to do with PSI research or testing.
If you do not focus on the test (or notice lines halfway down), then people are getting the answers from their subconscious.
There is no image OVER the image. It is an auto-stereo-gram depth file.
(click here)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostereogram
(stay on that site until you can see the shapes inside those.)
Intuition does not mean getting answers from god or some supernatural force. I believe intuition is simply relying on your subconscious for choices.
It is not random. It is a loop (animated gig)
If you are noticing lines in the "circle" drawing that "give it away" I could fix this by also making the circle drawings I use random. There are 8 different auto-stereo-grams inside that circle animate gif so some efforts were made to stop visual recognition.
The computer does not follow previous results. There are only 3 shapes used so the odds are one in 3 you will have the same shape on the top or the bottom, and even greater that this will apply for one of the 2. They are most assuredly completely random.
Attempting to visually recognize them, or focussing on them if you understand how to focus on auto-stereo-grams, is actually considered cheating for this kind of test. You are supposed to rely on the information conveyed to your subconscious.
I have described how I could fix this test so you would never "recognize" them. I am not prepared to change them or improve upon them.
If you can even THINK OF ANY better test IN THE WORLD that allows you to use your intuition, I would happily withdraw my statement that this is the only method in the world to practise your intuition.
I also have 2 other methods of this test.
a) use a color imperceptibly different from the background color for shapes.
b) use u.v. ink or a color just outside perception to color the shapes.
I stand by my tests as the only method in the world for practising your intuition. I really do not want this thread to be about that though as it is off topic.
Is the pattern repeated and not generated new every time?
I did look at it and didn't notice the effect you mentioned but I must admit I can be a bit slow to see things at times (boxing matches for example).
Of course people will try and "cheat" so if you are allowing for cheating you can't blame us. Why have a pattern over the top any way?
Last edited:
There are people who hear voices. They better be in treatment, or some one is probably going to get hurt.
An example of a mild hallucination is seeing the Virgin Mary in the steam on the bathroom mirror, then setting up a shrine there and getting it consecrated.
At some point every imagined extrapolation of fact weaves the dream world into reality, and after a while, the compass no longer points north. How do you navigate then?
I like the idea of mind melding and mysticism, but, like LSD, when the dream is over, what's left? A sense of the profound, maybe, I'll go with that. But we are most easily fooled by the that little voice in our heads that you refer to.
If not for that voice, that damn voice, everyone, and everything in the world, would be OK.
Like hypnosis?
Show me a published peer-reviewed scientific paper.
A common respected one.
Your subconscious is as likely to notice those lines as your conscious mind.
Quite often I will be reading a newspaper and a word will pop into my mind for some reason unknown to me.
Later on, I will find the word on the page somewhere.
I had registered the word without being conscious of it.
Also, you cannot have a test which has an obvious visual cue, and rely on people to ignore it.
Carry on with it if you wish, but the test is worthless.
This is my last post on the subject.
Last edited:
It is one thing to believe in thought transference but when you try and predict what is randomly coming onto a computer screen. How would you ever begin to explain that, even if you said intuition is controlled by the subconscious mind. It still has to be subconsciously conscious of something?
@ robbityrob & Captain Kremmen,
I am not sure you understand what auto-stereo-grams are or how they work.
The intuition practise area has NEVER been used for PSI research. We have used similar intuitives for tests pertaining to precognition, and also telepathy.
The random dots you have seen in those pictures are by no means "random". If you know what a Auto-stereo-gram is then maybe you or someone else here can tell us what this is.
Hopefully the picture is not overly offensive!
There is a picture in there, and I may open a thread on Auto-Stereo-grams just to find a bunch of people who can see it.
As is there a "semi-rude" picture contained in the DEPTH FILE in the above auto-stereo-gram my shapes can be seen as easily by those who know how.
There is no randomness to what can be seen in the above photo, nor is their randomness to the shapes I pose once the shape has been posted in the website i linked earlier.
Can you see a large mermaid in the picture below. It is over 4" in length.
To view a auto-stereo-gram
http://www.colorstereo.com/texts_.txt/practice.htm
HINT: You must look through the auto-stereo-gram as if it were a window. Try to focus 10 inches behind the picture. Algorythms are used to place dots along the path of both your eyes towards a background image.
will give information.
Once again. Myself and many can "instantly" focus on auto-stereo-grams. Having a test where people could see the answers would be the height of stupidity, and this is only for people to practise their intuition. Cheating during practise would also be very stupid.
I also would like to end this topic. I may start a thread about auto-stereo-grams in the art section.
I am not sure you understand what auto-stereo-grams are or how they work.
The intuition practise area has NEVER been used for PSI research. We have used similar intuitives for tests pertaining to precognition, and also telepathy.
The random dots you have seen in those pictures are by no means "random". If you know what a Auto-stereo-gram is then maybe you or someone else here can tell us what this is.
Hopefully the picture is not overly offensive!
There is a picture in there, and I may open a thread on Auto-Stereo-grams just to find a bunch of people who can see it.
As is there a "semi-rude" picture contained in the DEPTH FILE in the above auto-stereo-gram my shapes can be seen as easily by those who know how.
There is no randomness to what can be seen in the above photo, nor is their randomness to the shapes I pose once the shape has been posted in the website i linked earlier.
Can you see a large mermaid in the picture below. It is over 4" in length.
To view a auto-stereo-gram
http://www.colorstereo.com/texts_.txt/practice.htm
HINT: You must look through the auto-stereo-gram as if it were a window. Try to focus 10 inches behind the picture. Algorythms are used to place dots along the path of both your eyes towards a background image.
will give information.
Once again. Myself and many can "instantly" focus on auto-stereo-grams. Having a test where people could see the answers would be the height of stupidity, and this is only for people to practise their intuition. Cheating during practise would also be very stupid.
I also would like to end this topic. I may start a thread about auto-stereo-grams in the art section.
Last edited: