More of the collected wit and wisdom of Tnerb

Status
Not open for further replies.
parmalee said:
He's got a point there, glaucon: one must not enforcively enforce a rule that one must adhere to any such fallacious argument... or whatever and whatnot.
Click to expand...

Regards this and the heterosexual arguemnt:

Effectively enforcin a rule is th topic of debate or any real female out there (with relate to the male counterpart, supposively enorcing some rule)- which allows us to understand the similarities between the gender (in other words) the issues of rape within the two genders.

Now I can tell you right away that this is going to end in your failure as I am not easily fooled.
 
glaucon said:
Do you have the ability to punctuate?

Seriously man, I'm worried about you. I tutor 10-14 year olds who write better than you do.
Click to expand...

And what site do you do these things at.? Surely not this forum? None of my buisness but these 14 year olds who puncutate better than I do probably have it a lobetter off. Don't worry about someone who's being raped like I am lol I'm fineee mannnn
 
visceral_instinct said:
I did not ask you to eat a knuckle sandwich. I told you to get diagnosed.

I'll butt out of this thread as the urge to add 'you moron' or something worse to the end of my post is becoming uncontainable.
Click to expand...

You are calling me a moron! Hah! That's the most kind thing I"ve heard all day.Come here VI I wont get any bugs on you HAHAHA
 
And no I'm not mad a the dumbass for doing it. [it=ruining my life]He afterall secretely is a decent individual, however with no desire to show it.
 
Tnerb said:
(S)o you tend to agree(?)
Click to expand...

That one must not enforcively enforce the rule that one must adhere to some such fallacious argument? Absolutely.

Though I think it might be better phrased thusly: One must not enforce the rule that one must not adhere to some such fallacious argument; however, in so doing, the other party might interpret this lack of enforcement in this manner: one must adhere to some such fallacious argument. Therefore, it might not be such a bad idea to enforce the rule that one must not adhere to some such fallacious argument.
 
parmalee said:
That one must not enforcively enforce the rule that one must adhere to some such fallacious argument? Absolutely.

Though I think it might be better phrased thusly: One must not enforce the rule that one must not adhere to some such fallacious argument; however, in so doing, the other party might interpret this lack of enforcement in this manner: one must adhere to some such fallacious argument. Therefore, it might not be such a bad idea to enforce the rule that one must not adhere to some such fallacious argument.
Click to expand...

You've changed the spelling of my post- not acceptable. I'll read this garbage later.
 
Tnerb...there is this thing called a Reatraining Order. No this will not prevent him physically from coming into contact with you, but atleast its a comfort that you can use to help you be atease if/when he comes around and all you gotta do is call 911 my dear. Advice them that you have a restraining order against him. Leave immediatley, get out as fast as you can b/c if what you are saying is all true....it is going to get worse and not get better. If this is the same person you are talking but in a previous post you got up, and I know you know what one I'm talking about, this murderer is a fucking lunatic who belongs behind bars or strapped up in a white padded room.
 
Johnnycake said:
Who did he kill? Who did he rape? Who is he? Your going on and on in this weird rant. How do we know your not the killer rapist with a dual personality? Sounds like you've got a dent in the brain pan frankly. Why are you asking a bunch of scinerds these things, and not the police?
Click to expand...

Because thi person is the sci-nerd. He's not a sci nerd either but a criminal rapist out to destoy whateve he can destroy of any persn any time any where, all because he has no paitence to be the good that he is. If he continues doing what he is at present doing he will commit suicide. Therefore it is imperative for him to understand what and why he is doig. I am doing nothing wrong. I am trying to help. Offer advice or criticism where it is needed.
 
Discussing UG

UG is a hero to a few and not any that I am aware. I had here intended to express my thoughts with regard to this so called hero ug.

Now. Ug had exposed ideas or thories which explain that nature and thought is what we need. Thought or thought being bad. This idea reaches into some of the language philosophies and other metaphysical ideas which prolaim tat societ is stronger than he is protesting. It ismy believethat there is an influencial way to explain to him his own importance. If he feels that he should hide in sociey away from thoughts and such I would ask him why. Thre is in essense no buddhism which is universally true for all and the same one. There is no release from thought which thought is good.

I am simply trying to explain my ideas about his utter wortlessness. He prolaims to talk about "garbage" and that the planet is full of it. If by any means the planet is full o garbag that is his decision to consider or think. However, he is mistaken in that the man he ishe is hiding form scietyout of fear of weapns and mas destructin for example mentioned by a few posters in the other thread. Such weapons do not exist.

I cannot see a single use for the philosopher and had wnated some suggestion thx
 
It's hard to figure out what you're saying. As I understand it, UG (krishnamurti) isn't recommending any course of action or thought. Such actions are motivated by thought or the indirect thoughts of others which we have heard or read, and thought itself is the issue/problem. Whatever direction you move, you move away from natural, spontaneous action. The only thing you need is what you were born with (and food, clothing, shelter of course).
 
I wouldn't think there is anything special to dealing with someone who has murdered. They are all different. Is it someone with a temper? Then don't deal with them at all. Was it for profit? Defense? Revenge? Fun? Fear?
 
spidergoat said:
It's hard to figure out what you're saying. As I understand it, UG (krishnamurti) isn't recommending any course of action or thought. Such actions are motivated by thought or the indirect thoughts of others which we have heard or read, and thought itself is the issue/problem. Whatever direction you move, you move away from natural, spontaneous action. The only thing you need is what you were born with (and food, clothing, shelter of course).
Click to expand...

If this is what UG is proclaiming and that you worship SG for some reason, I have a few more criticisms to note out to you.

Firstly. UG is discussing the importance of thoughtlessness and a world of peace and action or actionless inaction. Irregardless to the criticism here proclaimed, one would ALWAYS note that your suggestion refers to a non societial non motivated non valid explaination of what is to be born. It reflects a mind likly gone mad and refrencing spontanious action as a cause for worship or praise (which is not true as it ruins the entire history of though and such).

By this manner politics, and so on and so forth- this would ask for a re-transformation of thought- which is impossible and therein puts him out to be some kind of prophet without a name. SOme kind of prophe who has no use.
 
Tnerb said:
If so, I was curious, because I am wondeing how I am supposed to deal with one. Murderer? By all means yes, but not all murderers are necessarially evil to the core. And therefore, the one of which I am dealing with, although a murderer, I don't know how to handle him, and therefore I ask for others to input information regading a murderer and what you would do with one if you ws approached by him instead of in real life but on the internet instead.
Click to expand...

Just deal with the person as you would deal with any other person, or what's the deal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top