More of the collected wit and wisdom of Tnerb

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am a male and I never had a urge to rape anyone . Yes I am heterosexual and I love the company of a nice woman . So I can say that any theory to generalise all men is a pure non sense and a little CRAP . :) .

Sure by al means you can and have all right ot rclaim a belief about all men is crap if that is what you feel like doing isn't it?

Also with regards to the typical relation it has an impact on women which is deserving of all viewing.
 
If so, I was curious, because I am wondeing how I am supposed to deal with one. Murderer? By all means yes, but not all murderers are necessarially evil to the core. And therefore, the one of which I am dealing with, although a murderer, I don't know how to handle him, and therefore I ask for others to input information regading a murderer and what you would do with one if you ws approached by him instead of in real life but on the internet instead.

Call the police. There is the absolute best you can do for him.
 
If so, I was curious, because I am wondeing how I am supposed to deal with one. Murderer? By all means yes, but not all murderers are necessarially evil to the core. And therefore, the one of which I am dealing with, although a murderer, I don't know how to handle him, and therefore I ask for others to input information regading a murderer and what you would do with one if you ws approached by him instead of in real life but on the internet instead.

Call the cops, get a gun.
 
If you read the first post, clownboy, he was asking how you dealt with it
I made him a cup of coffee then we sat down and chatted for a couple of hours.
Then he went home and I went to bed

What does "deal with" mean?

Like Baron said: in what context? Under what conditions?
The question "how do you deal with it?" is meaningless unless more "details" are specified.
Otherwise you end up with a "clownboy" answer like "Yes. Next question".

I get a Christmas card from him and his wife every year without fail.
He's a nice guy.
 
I made him a cup of coffee then we sat down and chatted for a couple of hours.

i want to drink it out of a tin can. by a fire, looking up at the stars, playing a guitar and the wind blowing. and i dig into my pouch of tobacco and roll a smoke. we will chat like cowboys.:D
 
Also, if you require evidence, then I suggest you read this book:
teach yourelf Post Modernism [it is a part of the teach youself series.]

Firstly, attempting to reference a book as evidence is fallacious:
ad verecundiam.

Google it.

Secondly,

What I'm suggesting after immense researching is that there is a war going on in the world which involves sexual qualities, perhaps sharing the superority of a male in every respect. What is therefore needed?

"Immense researching"???

brent, it's difficult for me to believe that you're remotely capable of performing the most rudimentary manner of research (to say nothing or actually reading a book).
Your style (sic) of writing consists entirely of disjointed ramblings. An incoherent stream-of-consciousness monologue is not an effective means of communication.

This is not your blog; this is a forum for discussion.

Do yourself a favour; take a break from here, go and read this (or better yet, purchase it):

The Elements of Style

IMO, everyone on this site should be conversant with this book.
 
If you know in fact he did murder someone, I mean there needs to be substantail proof. Just b/c he said so doesnt matter. If it is true and he did murder someoen and he told you the details and if you do the research and find iout this is true, you can be held liable. Its called conspiracy to murder. only IF IN FACT that he murdered someone.

NOW my concern is of the victim...were they a child moleseter? A drug dealer? An innocent person? If it was someone who was a child molester then fuck it. The molester derserved it. But if the victim was innocent, this is just my opinion...I would turn them in. If you know in fact that this person you are talking bout did murder someone...I'm glad I'm not with that on my mind.... Think it over. Good luck hun.
 
Firstly, attempting to reference a book as evidence is fallacious:
ad verecundiam.
Glaucon. This will be the last time you and I have this arguement about our/your own utter foolishness.
ad verecandium as a fallicious arguement of style on a science site is fine, however legal to critiize and moderate by this form it is not.

Secondly, Your own arguement of criticism is irregardless to the entire style of arguement of which I a presenting.

Google it.

Secondly,
Go on.



"Immense researching"???
Correct.
brent, it's difficult for me to believe that you're remotely capable of performing the most rudimentary manner of research (to say nothing or actually reading a book).
Your style (sic) of writing consists entirely of disjointed ramblings. An incoherent stream-of-consciousness monologue is not an effective means of communication.
Well. Most of the books of which I read, I pay particular attention to them were I to actually read one. And I don't read garbage such as you are saying either.

This is not your blog; this is a forum for discussion.
It is not my blog of course it is a discussion forum of course:rolleyes:
Do yourself a favour; take a break from here, go and read this (or better yet, purchase it):

The Elements of Style

IMO, everyone on this site should be conversant with this book.

Glaucon. When have I ever wanted or even remotely desired to ever take your suggestions?

Not once, never, thank me and thank god; if you believe everyone on the site should be converant or whatever with the book you're asking me to check out, that's not really a problem. Simply enforcing a rule that one must adhere to any such casual argement as your claiming, is something one must not do enforcively. That is your mistake, no one elses.
 
lmfao.You're cold huh you want to be warmed up?

No thank you, when I want that I'll ingest some caffeine and move around a bit.

So Visceral, although you've never had a desire or urge to rape anyone neither have I. This is an important topic that althoughyou do not desire to rape anyone, you still do have the similar impule(sic) especially regards if you ar(sic) a female.

So now you concede that I have no urge to rape, but that I do have a similar urge. What urge exactly?

Please go get diagnosed for possible schizotypy, by the way. Your posts are very close to the disoriented and structureless 'word salad' seen in schizophrenics.
 
He's got a point there, glaucon: one must not enforcively enforce a rule that one must adhere to any such fallacious argument... or whatever and whatnot.
 
No thank you, when I want that I'll ingest some caffeine and move around a bit.



So now you concede that I have no urge to rape, but that I do have a similar urge. What urge exactly?

Please go get diagnosed for possible schizotypy, by the way. Your posts are very close to the disoriented and structureless 'word salad' seen in schizophrenics.

LoL.

Go eat a nuckle sandwitch, as that is preciely what you are asking me to do.
 
He's got a point there, glaucon: one must not enforcively enforce a rule that one must adhere to any such fallacious argument... or whatever and whatnot.

I never said must did I? I said one enforces a rule that one must. This is beyond the strictest sense, criminal of glacon to say! I am surprised at him!
 
LoL.

Go eat a nuckle sandwitch, as that is preciely what you are asking me to do.

I did not ask you to eat a knuckle sandwich. I told you to get diagnosed.

I'll butt out of this thread as the urge to add 'you moron' or something worse to the end of my post is becoming uncontainable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top