RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
So, a lot of living quarters nearby.
can you circle them on the picture to show ?
So, a lot of living quarters nearby.
Correct.It seems that the missiles hit nothing of tactical nor strategic value.
Accurate?
I don't know. The closest buildings do not look like living houses, but the nearby quarter behind the green look like usual living quarters.can you circle them on the picture to show ?
It seems that the missiles hit nothing of tactical nor strategic value.
Accurate?
The choice was, of course, made by the attacking side, but there were obviously also some restrictions from the Russian side, as for the path of the rockets, as for the targets. The main restriction was a quite large region around the Russian bases. And, as a target, the government quarters of Damascus were explicitly forbidden (this was explicitly said, I have heard it).Who chose the targets for the missiles?
So far about who lies, Trump or Putin. SOHR decided not to destroy its reputation by publishing obvious lies, and the 65+ does not even contradict the Russian 71. (As I wrote - they lie about anything one cannot easily prove and what is useful for anti-Russian propaganda, but they give quite accurate information where they have to expect that lies can be easily detected.)The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights managed to monitored interception by the regime forces to tens of missiles which targeted their positions and military bases in the Syrian territory, where several intersected sources confirmed to the Syrian Observatory, that the number missiles that were downed, exceeded 65 missiles, of the total number of missiles fired by the Trio Coalition, while the air and rocket strikes, caused great material damage, while no information about casualties was reported yet.
Not at all. The US claimed after the failure that the empty unprotected shacks they succeeded to destroy were all the targets. Which is what you have to tell if you want to sell that there were no interceptions.Arguing about how many missiles hit is just a mindless dick measuring contest. If Tomahawks were intercepted, whoopeedeedoo, they fly slowly and are based on old technology. Intercepted or not, it looks like the US and its allies hit all the targets they intended to hit and thoroughly destroyed them.
The US is definitely bullshitting, given that they claim nothing intercepted but even SOHR acknowledged 65+ intercepted. Why do you think the Russians have to present something? There was enough evidence visible, so much that SOHR decided they would destroy their reputation by lying about the 65+ they know about.The US claims all targets were struck within a two minute span, and most of the Syrian air defense launches came well after the initial impacts, so someone's definitely bullshitting, but now that Russia's making its own claims, they ought to put their money where their mouths are and show some of the wreckage from un-detonated NATO missiles.
By the way, some information from the ground in Douma:
According to the information I have, it is not Russia or Assad (this American journalist obviously has access) but the OPCW or UN guys responsible for the security of the OPCW inspection have yet denied access. Too dangerous yet. As I have written yesterday or two days ago there has been some fighting with some remaining terrorists who have protected some hidden weapon storage. So, quite plausible that some bureaucrats responsible for the security have problems.Thank you for bringing that back up. What's the excuse for Russia and Assad to deny OPCW access to the site, which was nowhere near any US coalition strikes?
This night there was another attack against some Syrian airbases, not completely clear which have been attacked, but what seems clear is that T4 was again among the targets.
According to the information I have, it is not Russia or Assad (this American journalist obviously has access) but the OPCW or UN guys responsible for the security of the OPCW inspection have yet denied access. Too dangerous yet. As I have written yesterday or two days ago there has been some fighting with some remaining terrorists who have protected some hidden weapon storage. So, quite plausible that some bureaucrats responsible for the security have problems.
Sorry, CptBork, but I have different information about what prevents the OPCW visits to the critical cites, and therefore I think they hide nothing. At least the hospital seems open to journalists, there have been actual photos from it working with patients inside.So once again I ask you- if it's not chemical weapons traces, then what do you think Russia and Assad are hiding in Douma?
I have no privileged insider info, I use completely open sources, simply also Russian and German ones given that I know the language. What I have seen there was some shooting nearby. And the difference is the bureaucratic-diplomatic ones: It is one thing to allow access to everybody who likes - if some journalist will be shot, or blown away by a mine, so what, his fault. But if this happens to an OPCW inspector, given security warranties from Russia, and in need of permission of its own security bureaucracy, is a completely different one.Why is the OPCW still not allowed in, if journalists are allowed? Please share your privileged insider info with the rest of us.
Feel free to name such nonsense "almost certain", I thought "highly likely" is the phrase of the day to make such nonsense claims.Given that Assad has already claimed to have full control of the area, and it has been visited by journalists both on organized tours and independently, as well as Russian officers and chemical weapons inspectors, it seems almost certain that this incident was staged by Assad or his allies in order to prevent the OPCW from completing its work.
I don't know. What I have heard was not even shooting at the convoy, but simply nearby shooting.Was anyone arrested or bombed after shooting at the UN convoy, were there any battles like there usually would be after such an incident, or do the Russians really expect us to blame it on Santa Claus?
What is the point? Russia has a free press, which, of course, speculates. There is no official theory at all, all what is done officially is to ask questions.Nobody outside Russia believes a word they say any more. There have been more than ten different absurd stories about the poisoning of the Skripals.
They give information what has been found in Douma. That's all. If on the smoke pellets is written "Salisbury", such is life.The same is true of this chemical weapon attack. First, there was no evidence of chemical weapons, according to the Russians. Now, apparently, not only is there evidence but it all points to Germany and , ludicrously, Salisbury - which is a rural market town whose only chemical plant was a gasworks that closed in the 1980s.
“At the time when they were in the area, shooting began from the part of the town where there were still a few dozen extremists, who were clearly warned ahead about who specifically will be arriving in the area and for what purpose,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.
I have no privileged insider info, I use completely open sources, simply also Russian and German ones given that I know the language. What I have seen there was some shooting nearby. And the difference is the bureaucratic-diplomatic ones: It is one thing to allow access to everybody who likes - if some journalist will be shot, or blown away by a mine, so what, his fault. But if this happens to an OPCW inspector, given security warranties from Russia, and in need of permission of its own security bureaucracy, is a completely different one.
Feel free to name such nonsense "almost certain", I thought "highly likely" is the phrase of the day to make such nonsense claims.
I don't know. What I have heard was not even shooting at the convoy, but simply nearby shooting.
By the way, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Relations announces that
“Syrian Government forces found chlorine in containers, the most dangerous kind of chemical weapons, from Germany and smoke pellets produced in – attention – Salisbury, Great Britain,”
https://www.almasdarnews.com/articl...s-from-salisbury-found-in-e-ghouta-zakharova/
Nobody outside Russia believes a word they say any more. There have been more than ten different absurd stories about the poisoning of the Skripals. It seems to be a scatter-gun approach, to flood the world with lots of contradictory "alternative facts" in the hope that nobody will know what to believe any more and we'll all give up. The same is true of this chemical weapon attack. First, there was no evidence of chemical weapons, according to the Russians. Now, apparently, not only is there evidence but it all points to Germany and , ludicrously, Salisbury - which is a rural market town whose only chemical plant was a gasworks that closed in the 1980s.
I don't think that St Petersburg troll farm is doing such a brilliant job.
How many times to explain you that, no, there are completely different security standards.If it's safe for high level Russian military officers and escorted journalists to visit the site and announce their presence, and Russian chemical experts claim to have tested the site and found nothing, then it should be just as safe for the OPCW.
That means, it is the UN which actually considers the situation as not safe, and the OPCW leadership which will start the investigation only if the UN security team considers the situation to be safe. So, given that Zeit is a pro-NATO source, forget about your fantasies.
Again, the hospital (the place where the fake video was made) is open and working. So, everybody can visit it, locals in need of medical help as well as Western journalists.Ok, first you post photos which purport to prove that the chemical attacks were faked, then you claim there may have indeed been an attack and that it's Germany or Britain's fault if there was one. So which is it?
There is indisputable evidence that the video in the hospital was faked, with a lot of details about how it was faked. Now with already three people seen in the video, two physicians and one "gassed boy", telling what has happened, on videos open in the net.Do you have indisputable proof that the attacks were faked, or do you have indisputable proof that something really happened?
How many times to explain you that, no, there are completely different security standards.
Then, a more detailed description I have found in http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2018-04/giftgasangriff-duma-opcw-ermittlungen-syrien-un which is a NATO propaganda paper, citing Ahmet Üzümcü, who is general director or so of OPCW. What was attacked was not the OPCW team itself, but a UN security team, and they visited not the site itself, but the town. The job of the team was to look at the situation in the whole town.
That means, it is the UN which actually considers the situation as not safe, and the OPCW leadership which will start the investigation only if the UN security team considers the situation to be safe. So, given that Zeit is a pro-NATO source, forget about your fantasies
Again, the hospital (the place where the fake video was made) is open and working. So, everybody can visit it, locals in need of medical help as well as Western journalists.
The particular house which is claimed to be hit by the bomb (the video where the gas bomb is sleeping in a bed) should be secured by the police, until the OPCW inspection comes. The guided tour was, IIRC, made to the hospital, not sure if to the site itself too. Clearly, one would not allow Western journalists doing something on the site itself unobserved , the danger that they would place false evidence would be far too large. The area around the house is open to the public - normal people are living there. And of course Russian journalists are not snowflakes, they have no problems with visiting even the front line, so of course they go around and ask locals what they can tell about these "attacks".
Then, that the Syrians have found yet another storage, with nice things from Germany and Salisbury, is completely unrelated additional information.
There have been claims about some probes from the victims appearing somewhere in the South, Jordan or so, which was laughable, given that Douma was encircled. This seems to have been understood, and this "evidence" has not been mentioned in the media after this, so it looks like we can forget about it.
There were some photos of victims, and they also have been criticized as probably faked.