The Great Tach .. defender of scientific principles, attacker of all things cranky and pseudoscientific .. is reduced to cheap clichés and one liners ..
No one cares about your "opinion". So, butthurt much.
Really ? How did you form that conclusion on a hard physics / maths thread ?
Perhaps you're assuming ? .. not a very scientific method.
Perhaps you're descending into the superstitious and mystical again ? Did they (everyone else) telepath this information to you ?
Maybe if you had done something scientific, such as check the stats over the last couple of days, you would have .. detected .. (lol) that the hit/view rate on this thread has significantly increased, particularly since my involvement. Using that vast intellect of yours (in a rigorous and scientific manner - of course) you could have then .. deduced .. (lol), that since it was just you and I, and since you were posting cheap clichés and one liners while ducking for cover, some, perhaps many readers DID care about my opinion, thus making your statement, manifestly wrong - again!
Here's the points that are very disturbing about you.
1) You consistently attack those you label as cranks, crackpots, etc, in this forum (physics, science).
2) Others do this too (as well they should) but you do it in a particularly nasty, curt, dismissive, condescending and insulting manner.
3) You constantly uphold and re-enforce the fact that anything here must be based on accepted mathematical and scientific knowledge, and that anything else is pseudoscience, crackpottery, etc. Well and good.
4) The higher mathematical equations and principles that you pretend to, and that you make so emphatically, have to be taken at face value and on thrust by many (dare I say most) readers here, because much of it would be incomprehensible to them.
5)Thus, you have developed a reputation for yourself, as a highly knowledgeable authority in many areas of maths, science, physics.
6) As you quickly condescend upon, and indeed attack anything that even hints at been remotely pseudoscientific, superstitious, etc, it would then, BE REASONABLE for a less educated reader, to believe that all your material is TOTALLY FREE OF of such pseudoscience and superstition.
7) In an earlier post, you said ..
Knowing the Jarecki story, I figured that there was no way the management would let them play if their program was any good, so I tailored my bets to be exactly the opposite of theirs. One hour later I left with an extra 800 EUR in my pocket.
8) I say this is errant, superstitious, pseudoscientific nonsense. My main (but not exhaustive) reasons being ..
a) No roulette result is determined by the previous one.
b) Even if there was a miniscule roulette bias (a MOST UNLIKEY thing) you would have had to be there for a vast amount of time to take advantage of it (a MOST UNLIKEY thing) and it would have had to be a higher effect than the houses 5% on roulette ( a MOST UNLIKELY thing) ..
9) Yet you say it had positive results for you in AN HOUR .. lol, Tach .. it could have been the power of manifestation .. what, were you simultaneously reading 'Think And Grow Rich' or something ?
10) And you say
"I tailored my bets to be exactly the opposite of theirs"
Lol .. the dummies .. little did they know they were in the presence of The Great Tach !!!
And scarce could they divine for themselves that if their machine was giving them a predominance of persistent, losing results, that that would have been just as good as it giving them persistent winning results ..
NOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!! .. It took The Great Tach to work all this out !!!
11) I have repeatedly put the nature of your superstition to you in this thread, but you haven't resiled from it, nor have you tendered any scientific basis for it. That's really bad.
12) What's much worse, is that for many years .. (by your terms, this happened many years after the 70's, so lets say you were in Monte Carlo in, what, the 80's, 90's ?) .. yes, for many years, and certainly for all those years you've been here, you have continued to believe your superstition, to the extent that you published it with some exuberance here - IN A HARD PHYSICS / MATHS thread.
13) Can you realise the ENORMITY of this ? You, The Great Tach, the accomplished high minded and never wrong mathematician, has believed the the most egregious error all these years .. and not on a complex, disputed, vague and nebulous issue, but on one as simple and fundamental as this one!
14) If then, you continue to believe this superstition how can anyone trust anything else you say that may be beyond their grasp ? What higher error and superstition and pseudoscience could THAT contain ?
15) In another thread in Pseudoscience, I asked a moderator why he had banned someone. The moderator replied (much more can be quoted, but this will suffice);
-I banned him for spouting nonsense in the main maths/physics forum,
-In the main forum I, nor anyone else who has any honest interest in physics and discussing physics, will not put up with that shit.
By those terms, you DO NOT have an honest interest in physics and discussing physics and you are spouting superstitious nonsense!
