Nasor said:
Agreed. There would probably have been a significantly higher risk of injury to the girl if the police had attempted to subdue her by physically overpowering her.
There are actually statistics that prove this. I believe you could probably find the statistics at
www.taser.com but i'm not positive. I want to say the stats are that there has been an 80% drop in injuries to both suspects and officers since the tasers have been implemented, but I'm not positive on the number. But for some reason, 80% is screaming at me.
I am in "cop school" and have been sprayed with chemical (mase) and have been tazed. The taser was the worst pain I have ever felt in my life, however, I would rather be tazed then sprayed. With the taser, it's there and its done. 5 seconds of pain, thats it. Whereas when you get sprayed, your going to be in some considerable pain that can last anywhere from 30 minutes to 2 hours.
I remember there being an uproar a long time ago about a kindergartner who was tased by police. The story behind it is that the kid was in the principles office, had somehow got ahold of some broken glass, and I don't remember if he was cutting himself or if he was just threatening the cops or what. I remember thinking this kid was demented though. Especially for being in kindergarten. Anyway, the police tazed him and took him into custody. The kid was fine after the 5 second ride from hell. Holy moley people went nuts. It was a justified taze but holy crap. People did not like that.
I have absolute no quams and will not hesitate to use the taser. Yes, it hurts like a bitch, but its the safest and quickest way to end a dangerous situation. I would much rather tase a child then spray them. I know when I was sprayed, it affected my breathing. It was much harder to breath, and I think that would freak a kid out more then the dreaded 5 second ride.
-Kooter