Reiku, no offense, but you're being dumb right now.
No offense, but you don't know anything about the chances, never mind random events.
Reiku, no offense, but you're being dumb right now.
No offense, but you don't know anything about the chances, never mind random events.
lol.. ok then.
Enmos, have you listened to anything i have said?
The main point is, is if you believe that things ''just happened,'' there are still statistical maths behind how such a thing can even arise. Because of these statistics, it seems highly improbable.
This is the point.
I have heard this ID approach many times before Reiku..
Sorry.. carry on, without me.
The probablity of having a DNA strand in its form stands at around:
$$8.00 x 10^{-66}$$
I also know, that we have experiemented on creating life from a goo of nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen and carbon, by sending strong electrical impulses into its structure, and each experiment has prooved fruitless. What does this say about the theory of evolution?
Evolution is n-statistical, nothing for me to educate myesef on, Enmos.
Synthesizer - rubbish, sorry. But evolution does concern itself with life, since everything depends on it. Yet another rubbish remark.
I am worried about people round here.
This is the biggest pile i have seen today.
''
The simple answer is that it doesn't and it doesn't have to, that isn't in evolution's breif ''