Why do you deny the fact someone can back my claims?
Why do you deny the fact that the entire scientific community rejects your claims?
Iasion
Why do you deny the fact someone can back my claims?
You are overlooking the size of some of these bolides. That, combined with their kinetic energy, means that some impacts were sufficient to entirely vaporise oceans and melt a considerable portion of the primitve crust. While there is dispute amongst specialists as to whether life originated in 'a warm pond', around a sub-sea vent, within a subterranean haven, or arrived fully formed from space, there is no disagreement I am aware of that the bombardment was sufficently intense to prevent life forming and surviving.
The prevailing view for the formation of the moon is that it is a consequence of the proto-Earth being struck by a Mars sized object. This is common knowledge and has been the view since the early 80s.Walter L. Wagner; said:I don't necessarily believe it, but I don't necessarily dispute it either. It does not, to me, appear that he has evidence for such Mars-sized impacting objects, and that rather that is conjecture on the author's part.
Since we have only gross speculation to suggest how life might have arisen it is completely groundless to say 200 million years appears adequate. It may be. It may not be. At this point we cannot say.In any event, whether the time-window for life's evolution to the first cells was 200,000,000 years or 1,000,000,000 years is likely irresolvable with our current knowledge, and 200,000,000 years does appear adequate.
Why are you opposed to the consensus view on the effects of the Heavy Impact Phase? You have not given a single valid reason apart from a misinterpretation of a document that I have provided. Your position continues to look like an argument from incredulity.