Legally is atheism a religion?

That's one of them, yep.

That is one of the factors excluding theism as a religion - too many theistic religions, all different.

All right: so your position is that there are too many theisms for atheism to be called any one thing; that atheism cannot then be narrowly defined.

But - related to the above - any given thing can indeed have a multivariate definition. Cannot "atheism" then simply be the origin on multiple axes of belief, as proposed by Dawkins for a single axis of belief? I don't think it can be excluded from the process because it doesn't correspond to a single description.
 
Atheism is a religion in the same way that not playing football is a football team, or that not owning a car is a type of car, or that bald is a hair color.
yet you don't see such groups seeking legal representation (like say the non-car owners asserting some sort of legal issue relevant to car owners)
 
geoff said:
But - related to the above - any given thing can indeed have a multivariate definition.
But such multivariate definition is hardly going to but the Buddhist atheists and the Taoist atheists and the Navajo atheists and the areligious atheists in the same religion - is it?
light said:
yet you don't see such groups seeking legal representation (like say the non-car owners asserting some sort of legal issue relevant to car owners)
In my town we've seen exactly that - such as redesign of development plans for a major street due to lobbying from a coalition of bus riders, pedestrians, bicyclists, wheelchair neighbors, nearby poor families with children, and other non-car owners blocking a design too preferential to car-owners and their interests.
 
But such multivariate definition is hardly going to but the Buddhist atheists and the Taoist atheists and the Navajo atheists and the areligious atheists in the same religion - is it?

Well, if we're talking theism specifically...then yes, it should. Are you implying spirituality as a possible side-issue? Spirituality is another dimension altogether.
 
In my town we've seen exactly that - such as redesign of development plans for a major street due to lobbying from a coalition of bus riders, pedestrians, bicyclists, wheelchair neighbors, nearby poor families with children, and other non-car owners blocking a design too preferential to car-owners and their interests.
I was thinking more in terms of say car insurance or something that is exclusive to motor vehicle owners (as opposed to something like usage of civil space, which draws a wider cross section)
 
Back
Top