I'm wondering should the movement die once the carcass has been devoured. There are only so many exploiters of high position to be had.Now there's a stupid question.
Are you trying to wait out the movement so you can get back to work?
I'm wondering should the movement die once the carcass has been devoured. There are only so many exploiters of high position to be had.Now there's a stupid question.
Are you trying to wait out the movement so you can get back to work?
Yes, but is your average criminal as newsworthy as say one of high position??? No. There will always be crime.
?? No. Most criminals aren't "of high position."Yes, but is your average criminal as newsworthy as say one of high position?
I'm wondering should the movement die once the carcass has been devoured. There are only so many exploiters of high position to be had.
The thing is, issues arise in the public conscience and then recede. I think it more a news cycle than a social movement, but I could be wrong.Which brings us back to my question.
The thing is, issues arise in the public conscience and then recede. I think it more a news cycle than a social movement, but I could be wrong.
Possibly you're too busy projecting. I was trying to have a conversation with you. As far as your question is concerned, I feel no need to be on the defensive.Well, there is no surprise about the point that you have no idea what you're on about, but still.
That's very true. But it brings attention to a problem - and once there's enough attention on a problem, new laws are passed and new social memes are created that help prevent its recurrence in the future.The thing is, issues arise in the public conscience and then recede.
I will give you that. I think of the oil crisis of the 70's. It did spark change in the industry and gave light to our dependency on foreign oil. I suppose we will wait and see how this plays out.That's very true. But it brings attention to a problem - and once there's enough attention on a problem, new laws are passed and new social memes are created that help prevent its recurrence in the future.
Possibly you're too busy projecting. I was trying to have a conversation with you. As far as your question is concerned, I feel no need to be on the defensive.
And when all the high-profile offenders have been outed, will the issue die a quiet death?
The thing is, issues arise in the public conscience and then recede.
If it were not for the big names being dragged out into the limelight, no one would have given it much notice. Don't get me wrong, I think it's a good thing that those involved are being outed, but I have to wonder how the movement will maintain its momentum once they run dry on perp's of notability. Once the commotion has died, will the average sexual predator much care what happened to Kevin Spacey, or any other high profile perp? Probably not. It might cause reason for those of position to be cautious, but will it really rock the world of those who don't care?You're on. What the hell does that even mean?
The biggest risk that victims of abuse face today isn't "running dry" of abusers, it's the glorification of sexual abuse as personified by Trump and people like him. (He called Bannon "bam bam" during his tenure at the White House due to his tendency to "bam bam" on women.) Fortunately that's been partially counteracted by the high profile cases that involve abusers going down.If it were not for the big names being dragged out into the limelight, no one would have given it much notice. Don't get me wrong, I think it's a good thing that those involved are being outed, but I have to wonder how the movement will maintain its momentum once they run dry on perp's of notability.
I suppose. I'm watching. I'm thinking that it will have more influence on the younger generation than the older. I haven't talked with my son or daughter about it, but it would be interesting to get their perspectives.Fortunately that's been partially counteracted by the high profile cases that involve abusers going down.
That's good; that means that simple attrition will improve the problem as well.I suppose. I'm watching. I'm thinking that it will have more influence on the younger generation than the older.
I think so. Looking at my own children, they are very much a reflection of their culture, holding ideas that are current in the public sphere.That's good; that means that simple attrition will improve the problem as well.
Can we find self-confidence and personal agency in being a victim? Maybe we can. I'm willing to watch and see.
No, detachment is not the issue. All of us have been victims one time or another, including you. There's no problem relating to it. The resolve to deal with it and move on is what's important. Again, if the #MeToo movement makes a woman stronger rather than weaker, then it will be worth the fuss. I'm still watching.The problem, Bowser, is detached, meaningless questions like that.
I think part of the problem is that something you are known to disdain↑ when #TheWomeAreSpeaking; pretentious vapidity might at least mean a man is pretending to say something, but the pointed disrespect really is problematic.