New title to thread - Dark space always exists, and light is a state created by the brain.
And I will edit your incorrect sentences so they are correct.I will put 3 sentences of truth and a conclusion of truth
That's not what empty means.When I refer to empty , I simply mean empty to sight, obscured
I know empty is not occupied, but in the dark space without light , you can not see there is anything there so you could only presume empty until you could see. Seeing an object is the evidence required to see that the space is not empty, if you can not see that the space is empty you can conclude the space is either empty or contains matter, that is the only 2 logical options.That's not what empty means.
No. You could feel around to see if there's anything. Or use any number of artificial devices to determine what's there (sonar, radar, IR camera etc.) "Empty" means "empty." If you couldn't see you could reasonably say "I don't know what's in there" but you could not say it was empty (of any given level of anything) until you could examine it.I know empty is not occupied, but in the dark space without light , you can not see there is anything there so you could only presume empty until you could see.
No, a rational person would conclude "I don't know."Seeing an object is the evidence required to see that the space is not empty, if you can not see that the space is empty you can conclude the space is either empty or contains matter, that is the only 2 logical options.
I don't know means the same thing, if you can not see what is there, you do not know what is there, the only two logical options are then the volume is empty, or the volume contains matter.No. You could feel around to see if there's anything. Or use any number of artificial devices to determine what's there (sonar, radar, IR camera etc.) "Empty" means "empty." If you couldn't see you could reasonably say "I don't know what's in there" but you could not say it was empty (of any given level of anything) until you could examine it.
No, a rational person would conclude "I don't know."
There is a box under my desk as I type this. Is it empty or full?
43 pages of the same repetitious crap. This should have been cesspooled long ago.
It makes sense to me, Dark space always exists, and light is a state created by the brain. That does not make a statement of saying EM radiation does not exist, the EM radiation waves is the energy that you brain converts into pictures and gives the impression of light , the particular condition that someone is in at a specific time.Light is a thing however and you already know that. It is an EM wave. You don't disagree with that so your new thread title makes no sense (even to you).
Dark space being a thing, dark space has dimensions. Dark space is the natural state, stars are made, dark space is not.Without our brain (or eyes) we don't perceive light but the EM wave still exists so it is a "thing" in that sense.
Dark being a thing is ridiculous of course. Whether "dark" is the natural state or not is another question (and where you seem to get off track).
I agree after 41 years on the planet my idea sounds stupid and silly to me, but when considering the idea objectively, the idea really is not that silly.No matter what you title this little "theory" of yours it'll still be wrong, silly and stupid.
Space has dimensions being "dark" doesn't change anything.Dark space being a thing, dark space has dimensions. Dark space is the natural state, stars are made, dark space is not.
Dark is a state of the mind.Space has dimensions being "dark" doesn't change anything.
That means it's not a thing then.Dark is a state of the mind.
It depends on how you define thing, I consider a process to be a thing, dark and light are a state and process of the mind, but also dark space always exists relative to us.That means it's not a thing then.
Really? This silliness has gone on long enough...New title to thread - Dark space always exists, and light is a state created by the brain.
Plants exist because of EM radiation, they point towards the nearest energy source, like you said plants do not have a mind, relative to the plant , the plant can not see, the plant does not see light, the plant senses EM radiation.Really? This silliness has gone on long enough...
TC, pray tell, if light is a state of mind, how do plants know to grow towards the light? They have no brain. They have no eyes. They have no mind.
Yet, they sense the light and grow. Yet light doesn't exist - except in the mind.
I can't wait to see how you explain this one away...