I will add some questions of logic.
This should be good.
1. If the distance between the Sun and the Earth increased, the intensity of the Sun, over distance would lessen, and eventually by increased distance, we would only see darkness.
Of course! and readily explained and observationally observed via the "Inverse Square Law"
Or, that the intensity of light from any object falls off as the inverse square of the distance between the emitter and receiver.
2. If the distance continued to increase, in time, the Earth would near another Star, and it would be more intense and we see darkness as light again.
Not at all, and your hypothesis has been experimently and observationally invalidated without question.
3.Without EM radiation we can not visual perceive that we can see.
Wrong, and again experimentally and observationally invalidated.
Eyes have evolved to be sensitive to different regions of the EMS.
4. Other species can see in the dark, compared to us, they are deemed to have better night vision than Humans.
Other species have eyes that have evolved to detect minimal intensity of light, in regions our own eyes may not be able to detect and we see as darkness.
5. Some species have a reverse effect of sight in the day time, and it would be to bright for their eyes to function.
Again, this pertains to the intensity of the light, and the sensitivity of the eyes.
6. If the Earth decreased its distance to the Sun, the energy intensity, would be to much, and we could not see.
See previous validated and experimentally verified answer.
7. Night and day is deemed by rotation of the Earth, when night and day does not exist, if the Earth had another Sun, that was parallel to our Sun, and the Earth was between them, then night would not exist and it would be always day.
Of course. And simply because the Earth would be bathed in intense light from all directions.
Night/Dark, as has been shown observationally and experimentally, is the absence or lack of intensity of light/photons.
8. 3 dimensional space , has explained, is constant to all observers.
???Space, is simply what stops everything being in the one spot, and combines with time as a 4D entity against which the laws of physics and GR operate.
9. A species at night see's it as light, when we see it as dark.
No, as in previous answers, and as has been observationally and experimentally verified many times, certain species have eyes which have evolved to be more sensitive to less intense light, or their eyes maybe sensitive to other regions of the EMS, such as infra red.
I believe all these statements to be logically true to all observers.
Children also believe in fairy tales.
I believe the species at night being able to see, is what shows us reality, and only by rotation, do we start to see, when the amount of EM radiation intensity is increased.
I also believe that saying another species has night vision, shows you my understanding of why I believe it is always dark, and only by evolution we can see in the dark.
Again, that is equivalent to children believing in fairy tales, and will remain so until you come up with some observations that invalidates what has been previously validated by other experiments and everyday observations.
I understand it will be and is hard to see what I am explaining, it is not every day someone tells you black is white.
You have explained nothing, and invalidated nothing.
I am currently in the process of trying to change my models, to a context of science definitions and not my own definitions, I understand my own models, and I understand if it is alien to you all, you will not understand.
Best of luck.
You say there is no logic involved so far, I beg to differ, the opening post is full of logic, the above statements are logical correct.
No, I do not say that. I say that 300 years of experimental and observationally verified accepted physics, shows that what you imagine is equivalent to children believing in fairy tales.
