If you can do that little thing (and answer Fednis48's questions), I'm sure everyone will be only too happy to concede your point/claim?
RealityCheck,
You cannot "concede" because you can never understand what this experiment is all about and because you make your living trolling websites.
Now the experiment constrains OWLS anisotropy via an experiment based on Compton scattering. The measurements have been taken at the GRAAL facility and the experimental data has been fitted in order to be compared against a parametrization in $$\zeta, \lambda$$ of the one way light speed $$c_{\gamma i}$$. This process resulted into placing constraints of the order of $$10^{-13}$$ for $$\zeta$$ and $$10^{-14}$$ for $$\lambda$$. To make the blow even harder, the paper lists a plethora of other papers constraining OWLS anisotropy. Here are a few (not all):
[2] V. G. Gurzadyan et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 19 (2005).
[3] V. G. Gurzadyan et al., Il Nuovo Cimento B 122, 515(2007).
[4] V. G. Gurzadyan et al., arXiv:1004.2867, 2010.
[14] E. Riis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 81 (1988).
[15] Z. Bay, J. A. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 841 (1989).
[16] T. P. Krisher et al., Phys. Rev. D 42, 731 (1990)
Here are some more:
Cialdea, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4 (1972), pg 821.
Champeny et al., Phys. Lett. 7 (1963), pg 241.
Champeney, Isaak and Khan, Proc. Physical Soc. 85, pg 583 (1965).
Isaak et al., Phys. Bull. 21 (1970), pg 255.
Turner and Hill, Phys. Rev. 134 (1964), B252.
Gagnon, Torr, Kolen, and Chang, Phys. Rev. A38 no. 4 (1988), pg 1767.
T.W. Cole, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. (1976), 175 93P-96P.
Ragulsky, Phys. Lett. A, 235 (1997), pg 125.
S.Schiller, P.Antonini, M.Okhapkin , Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, (2005)
Antonini, P., Okhapkin, M., Goklu, E., and Schiller, S., Phys. Rev. A 71, 050101(2005)
