From
this thread:
Is it human nature to rape? If child rapists aren't obeying their own natures... what are they obeying precisely? I think it's a very interesting topic - not something that can be dismissed in a single paragraph, and worthy of it's own thread. If only Satyr were around to lay this out eloquently and logically, in far more words than is strictly necessary. But he isn't. So my collection of confused and jumbled thoughts on the matter will have to do. I'm sure that all of the deeply penetrating insights that will be your contributions will quickly improve things.
So: on the one hand, man is a social species, dependent on his fellow man for his sense of self, his emotional well-being, often for his very survival. On the other hand, man is an animal like all the others, driven by need and desire - the need to eat, the need to drink, the need to breathe... and the need to procreate. Thousands of years of civilisation have taught us what is acceptable and what isn't; what is beneficial to our society and what is harmful. Laws have been developed to punish those whose actions are thought to do our society harm.
But: what if we were to cast off all the millennia of cultural progress and return to our 'natural state'? Would we still be so 'moral' in our treatment of others if there were no laws to govern what we can get away with and what we can't? Rape appears to be quite common throughout the animal kingdom. Lone alpha males of many species make it their business to drive away the males of a social group and impregnate the females. Without any laws or morals to govern their actions, need and desire are everything. Are we so different? When a male cat mounts a female in an alleyway does the female have to give it's consent? Is it good manners for the male cat to seek it? Perhaps all of the Sciforums members who are having such a hard time understanding that
RAPE IS BAD are just throwbacks to an earlier time - living curiosities who've somehow managed to unlearn everything that the Ancient Greeks taught them about what it means to be human. Or maybe not:
Edit: I've had a PM from Bells. I just want to make it clear that no criticism of her is implied in using her post as the opening comments. I like Bells - she's a smart woman and I've got nothing but the greatest respect for her opinions. It's just that I feel that this and similar comments need further exploration, and the thread that they came from wasn't the right place to do it.