It is true.His argument was that black Americans are being 'legally' killed without cause. That's not true.
The pattern here is your habit of posting reams of rightwing authoritarian racist gibberish, whether it has any relevance whatsoever to the thread or not. Why? Why did you just post that, right there, that I quoted?It should be noted, police kill more White Americans than black Americans, even though White Americans not only commit a significantly lower total number of violent crimes per percent population, but less total number percent overall as well.
That's something to consider when conducting your 'objective' analysis of the data. You may also want to look at the number of violent crimes committed against the minority category "Asian" Americans by white and black Americans. I think you'll begin to see a pattern.
And where did this goofy fantasy come from -
That reads as you claiming black guys in the US get to choose which race they want to be in. Tell me you don't really think that - I mean, it would explain why you think the racial identifications of white supremicists and BLM folks are equivalent, but holy cow - - -As in, an American citizen cannot be objectively categorized into a class of "White" or "Black" and must themselves subjectively identify with a category and chose to be in it or chose "Other". Are we clear on this?
Of course. Now we are back to the OP topic - under what circumstances is it ok to punch a "nazi", with a guy like milo or spencer as our current examples.It really depends on what you mean by 'threatens' in the category of 'directly' and the category of 'overtly'