Let's take it from when you entered the thread, to essentially a point of race, when the side discussion in the thread was the ridiculous notion of the fake Shroud of Turin. Then you decided that you weren't shocking and awe'ing enough, because you weren't getting enough attention in response to your trolling and flaming, so you went full retard:
If you're going to level a legitimate criticism you might want to keep the facts straight. I entered the thread in response to a post made by iceaura regarding the race and parentage of Jesus. After that post, all I did was respond to the succeeding comments generated by that post.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/ar...aving-an-abortion.161580/page-15#post-3564685
And suddenly, all eyes swivel to you.
I was making a fallacious comment about the reasoning of a fallacious diety regarding race and mysticism.
Maybe you realised that many here actually do view you as you present yourself and have presented yourself in the past.
In other words, you're quacking and looking like that duck.
What I expected was that people who should be familiar with my thoughts on religious matters would have recognized the sarcasm. Apparently I give them too much credit for their comprehension.
Suddenly, you openly admit to flaming and trolling, by citing devil's advocacy.
I didn’t initiate any flaming or trolling, that all started with Tiassa when he decided to use the posts as a justification to brand me a white supremacist by dredging up past disagreements.
Because you know, you're the dude that reads left wing news, etc.. While coming across like a right wing gone full retard.
I brought up the reference to the left leaning sites because I was accused by Write4U of visiting the wrong news stations.
It was Tailgunner Tiassa engaging in his anti supremacist crusade that injected the Michael Brown, the Duggers, and the Elizabeth Warren references into the discussion, I simply responded to his nonsense. How is posting the facts of the Michael Brown case mocking the murder of anyone? And I wasn’t mocking a white supremacist terrorist, although they deserve to be mocked, I was mocking Tiassa for comparing me to one.
In a thread, supposedly about abortion.
A thread that was supposed to be about abortion that devolved into a discussion about the ethnicity and parentage of Jesus. Everything I posted was in response to comments brought up by other posters, and it originated as a response brought up by the OP. All the rest of the off topic subject matter was injected other posters, mainly Tiassa.
But hey, you're here to play devil's advocate? Right?
That's why you decided to essentially run interference, change the subject and make it all about you. Why? Because you have an itch to scratch with staff and you figured you could get away with it by suggesting devil's advocate..
As usual, you’ve got this whole issue assbackwards. I never made it personal until accusations were leveled against me first. It was Tiassa who decided to reignite the beefs of the past, not me. The devils advocate stuff had nothing to do with any of the past discussions. So it’s more like you two misguided ideologs have an itch to scratch with me.
The thing with playing devil's advocate is that it is intended to open up a discussion or suggest a pause while we consider the other side of the argument. You aren't doing that. You are just flaming, because you need our attention for something or other.
I could care less whether or not I have your attention. If and when I do want it, I have no problem addressing you directly to get it. And if you want to keep a thread on topic, I suggest you don’t bring up content from unrelated past discussions to make your idiotic points.