Animal rights activists have perpetrated, encouraged, and benefited from a lot of violence while allegedly trying to convey the message that animals have rights. I contend that humans have the right to be top dog. Human rights, to eat, to use the materials that animals are made of, to live where we want to, and to own and use as we see fit, are superior to any rights that animals might have.
So the topic of this thread includes the right to own animals as property, whether violence is appropriate, or even the use of laws to prevent this, and whether we should put people, meaning humans, first.
So the topic of this thread includes the right to own animals as property, whether violence is appropriate, or even the use of laws to prevent this, and whether we should put people, meaning humans, first.
Last edited: