Pronatalist
Registered Senior Member
What if natural population growth does lead to people adapting far better than imagined? Wouldn't that be a very "good" thing to encourage?
There is absolutely nothing partly about it. Over shoot the carrying capacity of the ecosystem and the population will crash with the excess dying through starvation and disease.
There are no ifs, ands or buts.
Overshoot and collapse. You can watch it many places in Africa right now. There are no exceptions. It is not a nice way to go.
But are they properly developing to better ACCOMODATE rising population, or is it the same old evil corruption and needless conflict?
Nature simply does not have some of these "hard and fast" rules that population phobics like to cling to. Ever hear of "tipping points?" Well such terms often don't mean quite what the liberals opine them to mean. Let a country get "too populated," and it adapts and adjusts to getting so populated, and there's more parents having babies than before. Somebody spoke of "overcrowding syndrome," which I think they meant to mean, that the people get so used to "living in a crowd," that they think it's just the normal natural thing. I imagine that some shantytowns get so big and crowded, that people hear neighbors making babies at night, making it all the more impossible for them to "limit" their birthrates. Children living in cramped spaces, seeing their parents making babies, may also pair up and begin to mate and make still more babies, while yet young. So large youthful populations soar? But the populations go on rising, as humans ADAPT. The answer is to promote freedom, expand housing and infrastructure and development, not to rob people of, or disparage their precious darling babies. Ultimately, the entire planet may manage to "tip" towards being a very populous place, something that seems to scare population phobics. I think they are afraid to public admit sometimes, that humans are in fact adapting "too well" to their environment, portending supposedly a forecast of "increased crowdiness." I read somewhere, that we need a new paradigm. Oh really? Then here's mine. Parents can also have their "traditionally very large" families in the big city, and not just in the spacious countryside, as presumably, at some point, maybe there's more city, and less remaining countryside?
I consider babies coming out from between their mother's legs, just as natural as people needing to pee or to breathe or to eat. I don't buy the rampant lies of the "family planning" pushers, hawking their shoddy Big Pharma contraceptive potions and poisons. I don't agree with trashing people's traditionally pronatalist cultures, pushing promiscuity and "dirty sex," rather than faithful marriage sex, and complicating it with sabotage of the body's natural reproductive function. They say you can't stop people from having sex. Uh, would we even want to? Leave them be. Let them enjoy freedom and personal responsibility. But I don't expect for people to use unnatural and impractical birth control either.
For humans, natural increase is quite natural. I have no objection to letting human populations continue to naturally rise, as God designed humans to ultimately become quite abundant.
Even sci-fi has many ideas how much huger human populations may be accomodated. Enormous cities teeming with people, vertically-stacked population arcologies, underground cities, humans spreading to more worlds. Why can't humans explore such options a bit, if they can manage to populate towards them?
I read somewhere that villages in Africa are growing haphazardly into small towns. While India is better planning for such growth. I do want to hear that the villages are growing larger and closer together, swollen populations burgeoning naturally, that huge numbers of people are just letting their babies keep pushing out naturally unhindered because they love their children, because I think that's what people really want. They want to be free to enjoy having their possibly many children, REGARDLESS. But a more pronatalist world would do a far better job, making sure we are making the appropriate changes towards a more populous world, towards more indoor flush toilets, clean treated potable piped water into people's homes, proper street construction and erosion control, expanding infrastructure, inviting people to multiply and spread naturally into more areas so that all the more fellow human beings may experience life.
I hear that Muslims are trying to take over the world, by the power of their wombs. But I believe human life should proliferate anyway, as more and more people would be glad to live, so as many "religious" people tend to say, leave the door to life open, and welcome the babies to just keep pushing out. Babies are glad to come alive and live, even in the most populous of places. So I have no objection to huge booming populations throughout much of the world.
I get so disgusted with the incessant, culture-trashing, rampant contraceptive pushing. No wonder the U.S. gets such a tarnished image throughout much of the world. Condoms aren't the magic solution to all the world's ills. At some UN Population Conference, they said that they are trying to find "culturally appropriate" ways to push family planning. Oh really? Why don't they tell the truth, that they are globalist power mongers and just pretty much hate people, especially those "other people" who don't happen to be into their elitists evil cliques? What if there are no "culturally appropriate" ways? Are they then content to just welcome their populations to "explode" in size naturally? I would have to say, Yes, let the human race "blossom" in size naturally, as the more numerous we can manage to grow, so many more people can then benefit by being alive.
Ping! Ping! Ping!, some lady-feminist-meddler magazine article author opines about a baby on a mother's back, another inside, and a toddler following behind. Oh really? And why may not a mother enjoy having baby after baby, I might like to ask her? What's it to you? Many people still do not believe in pressuring people to unnaturally "regulate" their birthrates, for all sorts of religious and practical reasons. As described in the pioneer-time movie "Love Comes Softly," to a child's question of where babies come from, a man and a woman love each other so much, their love "overflows," and so a baby comes to life. Now how in the world can humans love each other "too much?"
"How can there be too many children? That's like saying there's too many flowers." Mother Teresa