Stop! Put me on the ignored list. I have some there.
Sure, I'll leave you alone. Just keep in mind that as rough as you *think* I've been on you, it was nothing compared to what you may still get from others.
Stop! Put me on the ignored list. I have some there.
Hello, I'm one of the wackos according to one or several of the moderators, I bet. No accounting for how people evaluate others. Name calling though is the best way to get in trouble in a forum, expect when the moderators agree or do it, lol, no offense.Stop! Put me on the ignored list. I have some there.
Pretty picture, the dice, not the atom governing a becoming random duality.In the quantum becoming (succession of events) we can not set a before and an after, so that the measurement of time is impossible. In the atom governs the becoming-random Duality.
Quantum-wave says:
So then, I guess that was the point of your thread; you wanted to pass on that bit of philosophy? Or do you want to chat about it?
So the answer to your question in that case would be no, you can't measure a quantum time that is instantaneous with no discernible start and stop.
But there is more to the story of photon emission. Photons are said theoretically to be like little buckets and the energy of the photon waits in the bucket until the bucket is full before it is emitted. In that case, there is a duration while the bucket fills, and so there is a theoretical quantum time involved with the quantum event of filling the photon's energy bucket. That might be a case where there is a quantum time = to the quantum period of filling the bucket. Agree?
Any quantum event dealing with oscillating model of the atom boils down to mathematical theory so when I talk about the length of time to fill a bucket it is theory, but certainly it is true to the best of my knowledge, and a very short time. We can't directly observe any individual quantum events or their discrete changes in the state of energy involved, and we can't observe atoms and electrons at work to the degree that an observation of a quantum event can be made. But ... we can detect changes in molecules as a result of quantum events, like the molecule of silver oxide changing when it is struck by light. We cannot see a photon, we cannot see the atoms bound in the molecule in the photographic paper as the chemical change occurs, but we can observe the effect that the quantum event of photon energy has on a macro level as the picture develops.I didn't know that, but it must be a very short time.
If the electron jump is instantaneous, why the filling of the "buckets" is not?
I think that our perception of time makes it seem to pass faster or slower depending on how occupied our minds are, lol. An hour can seem to pass before you know it, and then two minutes at a traffic light can seem like forever, so time in that sense is relative to our mental engagement. The watched pot never boils scenario. But time as a precise interval between two events can be measured by clocks, that is until relativistic motion becomes involve. Then even synchronizing clocks become a pain. I wonder if there is an accepted way to synchronize clocks at two remote locations so that motion experiments can be conducted with the same start time?That is, Quantum Theory also has its strengths and weaknesses, and some physicists and mathematicians don't want to admit that, things aren't very clear yet. I think that the unification of all forces in only one equation It will be in a dream.
Something similar happens with time, we don't perceive it directly, but we noticed its effects.
Take Alice and Bob, referred to as A and B in an old clock synchronization protocol; "if A and B are able to build perfect clocks and transport them perfectly they have effectively solved time synchronization completely and with only classical methods", but that was from ten years ago. Anything new in regard to building and transporting synchornized clocks slowly with no "noise"?
Q-W says:
I think that our perception of time makes it seem to pass faster or slower depending on how occupied our minds are, lol. An hour can seem to pass before you know it, and then two minutes at a traffic light can seem like forever, so time in that sense is relative to our mental engagement.
I wonder if there is an accepted way to synchronize clocks at two remote locations so that motion experiments can be conducted with the same start time?
Take Alice and Bob, referred to as A and B in an old clock synchronization protocol; "if A and B are able to build perfect clocks and transport them perfectly they have effectively solved time synchronization completely and with only classical methods", but that was from ten years ago. Anything new in regard to building and transporting synchronized clocks slowly with no "noise"?
You are right about gravity and acceleration, but you are going to have to be more clear if I am going to understand becoming. Are you saying that the particular relative motion between clocks, which we know will naturally cause them to measure the passing of time at a different rate, has to do with "becoming"?You have described the psychological time which is affected by our emotions and interest in what we are doing.
Conditions for two clocks are synchronized are: high accuracy, that they are at the same height above sea level and they are in state of relative rest.
Clocks measure time based on their own internal rhythm (becoming), which as we know can be affected by both the gravity and high speed.
Q-W says:
You are right about gravity and acceleration, but you are going to have to be more clear if I am going to understand becoming.
That doesn't look like an unreasonable summation. I just wrote the following for another thread where I talk about a hypothetical medium that fills space, but I doubt anyone follows my ravings so see if you think this is a reasonable summation too:STRENGTHS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
1 - Matter is composed for quanta and space.
2 - Different theoretical models of atom.
3 - Practical use of the strong and weak nuclear forces.
4 - Verification of the electron quantum jump.
5 - The discovery of the Higgs boson.
WEAKNESSES
1 - Explain all reality, including macrocosm, with quantum principles.
2 - Failure to observe directly particles.
3 - The rejection of that in the universe there are two realities that are governed by their own laws: microcosm and macrocosm.
4 - The existence of parallel universes.
5 - Teletransportation.
These lists are subject to change.
Q-W says:
I just wrote the following for another thread where I talk about a hypothetical medium that fills space, but I doubt anyone follows my ravings so see if you think this is a reasonable summation too:
I ask because the quantum time is always relative. A similar fact is alternating current. This can not be used in electronic communication because you can not control it.
I wait for your opinion.
What‽ AC is frequently used in electronic communication. And we can control it. What planet do you come from?
/thread
Quantum Time
Jonathan Oppenheim (2001)
"In quantum mechanics, time plays a role unlike any other observable. We find that measuring whether an event happened, and measuring when an event happened are fundamentally different - the two measurements do not correspond to compatible observables and interfere with each other. We also propose a basic limitation on measurements of the arrival time of a free particle given by 1/Ek where Ek is the particle's kinetic energy. The temporal order of events is also an ambiguous concept in quantum mechanics. It is not always possible to determine whether one event lies in the future or past of another event. One cannot measure whether one particle arrives to a particular location before or after another particle if they arrive within a time of 1/E of each other, where E is the total kinetic energy of the two particles. These new inaccuracy limitations are dynamical in nature, and fundamentally different from the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. They refer to individual measurements of a single quantity. It is hoped that by understanding the role of time in quantum mechanics, we may gain new insight into the role of time in a quantum theory of gravity".
Source: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/jono/thesis.html
I meant to appliances such as radios, televisions, computers, etc. The AC can not be amplified by an amplifier circuit.