Oh boy, this is going to be a long post....
What kind of argument do you expect me to present?
One that is ontopic and presents something contrary to my argument, preferably a fact.
Really though, you don't know how much of that interveiw was the truth.
That is true, at this point we just go and accept it as a true story.
On the other hand you don't know that even freakier things could go on, what this girl hasn't seen....
Why haven't any of the girls who've lived with him for a while now said anything about it?
It is explained in the interview... Access, or the denial of it. Also some girls might be not so proud of it...
All the years of being a sex slave, exposed to the public...you don't think any of them would do that to the poor old guy?
You are not getting it. It is all voluntary. Nobody is forced to do anything...
You have no proof that it's not 'a big happy family.'
The girl's account, plus their behaviour on Larry King.
You're slandering the name of a fine business man,
You are too young. It is only slander if it isn't true. By the way we are judging morality and not illegality, so slander wouldn't even apply....
Don't you think somebody like Hef would be a bit more cautious?
I would think, but close to 80, really, what can he lose?
You think he would let her watch but not participate, or is he just stupid?
You are really not getting the voluntary part, ain't you?
You're also slandering the names of those girls by calling them whores.
Man, this is getting tiring. Last time I checked, if you get paid for sex, you are a whore. Now the paying part doesn't have to be in cash. As I said it comes indirectly for the girls.
OK, since I got tired, here is a homework for you:
Let's say you have a girlfriend. I mean a real one. Ask her this (but before you do, put a helmet on, and make sure that there are no sharp objects around you):
Honey, what do you think of unprotected groupsex with you and your girlfriends or even a few girls from the street?
Please report back to me what she said....