You say you have a theory. I all I have seen in multiple posts from you are some vaguely expressed, ambiguous, sometimes contradictory statements that have the form of a weak and easily demolished analogy. You have not addressed any aspect of the universe mathematically. You have made no predictions. You have failed to explore the impact of your analogy on any important aspect of cosmology such as early star formation, galaxy formation, cosmic background radiation, etc.
Rather than a theory it is obvious to all that what you have is poorly formulated, badly expressed, wholly unfounded speculation. Are you quite unable to recognise this? Help me understand how you came to be so deluded. You may already have addressed this point earlier, but I would be intrigued to know your educational qualifications and where you acquired your limited, distorted and usually wrong view of the universe.
I have a Theory, it's called the Mable Theory. Mable is the
Mother of
All
Black Ho
LEs, the Black Hole at the Center of the Universe. I predict we will arrive at this Black Hole in 13.8 billion years. This Black Hole is 60 trillion times larger than the Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy. I predict that not only the Expansion will be found to be increasing exponentially, as it is according to Lee Smolin in his book on String Theory, but the Cooling Down will also be found to be increasing exponentially.
Mable is approximately 700 trillion years old.
Well, that's enough for predictions, Early Star formation came from Gravity assembling huge Hydrogen clouds, which compressed down until their centers went critical and certain isotopes of Hydrogen fused.
That's how the Early Universe started, from a huge ball of Gravity accreted Hydrogen, that went critical at the center. Now because the center was already compressed (and this applies to star formation too) such an explosion in such a confined Space caused other parts ofthe Cloud to go critical, resulting in a Cosmos that evolved slowly, starting from the core outwards,
gradually falling towards the center, faster and faster of course.
Now, this Speeding Up led to a Loss of Pressure (Bernoulli) and the Loss of Pressure led to Expansion (Boyle) and the Expansion led to Cooling Down as explained by the Joules-Thomson Effect. In addition, the Universe is Clumping Up, again - exponentially.
In my model of the Cosmos, the nozzle of a working Central Vac (CV) laid in the center of a room, there is a vortex at this nozzle. It is a zone of furious activity, and particles here collide and become elecctrically charged. Salesmen used to delight in showing customers how the Clumps went by the view port on the nozzle. From a roomful of dust particles, your CV will make Clumps, and
paradoxically, in this zone of
least density, are formed the biggest clumps.
So it is at the Center of the Universe, a void - about 5 million times the size of the Observable Universe. (We are becoming less dense).
Here, Balck Holes are forced to eat their accretion discs, or else risk having them ripped off in furious Hi-Speed battles with other Black Holes.
Here there is no light - it can't survive. It's cold - everything is in its Boez-Einstein state, where matter morphs but mass remains.
Here there are only Super Massive Black Holes. They rule this void, until, of course, one by one, they all fall into Mable.
I almost think these Black Holes are intelligent, the way they order their meals into long strings of matter that they accrete one by one.
Galaxies are merely the accretion rings of Black Holes. The sun (Sol) accretes Planets, just as Black Holes accrete Stars - it's all due to Gravity. What do you think Keeps the Moon in orbit around Earth? Dark Energy? - please! It's gravity, and I'm surprised you need me to tell you that.
These repulsive forces were manufactured - they don't exist. Gravity exists, and it's Universal Gravity that operates the Universe.
The CBR is merely that outside part of the GasCloud that hasn't yet noticed what is happening at the center. Gravity, like air, is elastic, and it will take time for the CBR to start moving.
Our Cosmos grows (like a Galaxy) when it passes through a particularly rich (with dust and gasses) part, and shrinks in a Void. Inthis sense, limited as it is, the Cosmos can expand. Otherwise, like everything relse in the Cosmos, we're going in. We are in a Big Crunch, always have been.
Deluded? It's you who have been juiced in it, my friend. You have fallen for the idea of a Belgian Priest who heard the Universe was expanding and decided there had been a Big Bang. Einstein later said of this Priest that he had 'a woeful lack of Physics,' and I agree. I agree with everything Einstein said, including that the Cosmological constant was the biggest Blunder of his carreer as a Mathematician. This came shortly after he married a Physicist, who I think explained to him that the manufacturing of repulsive forces was okay in Math, but would be considered
Poor Science in a Physics Lab.
You were told there was a Big Bang and you believed it - you'll probably die believing this fabrication, and Dark Energy too, but I, fortunately escaped - I can still think for myself. I have tons of ideas.
Once, I found myself able to disembody - to rise up out of myself. In the spirit world, I asked to meet God, and found I didn't like him. That got me thinking about other stuff, including the Cosmos, how it's behaving just like any other falling object, Speeding Up, Cooling Down, Expanding and Losing Pressure. But it's also Clumping Up, you see - and that spells Vortex.
An axis to the Universe was discovered by the Borge-Norling team, by hooking up astronomers around the world, and others swear they can see an axis in the W-Map picture.
If there's an axis, then I'm right. The Cosmos is a Vortex, probably shaped a lot like our Milky Way, with four arms etc etc. Of course, Modern Scientists will probably try to suppress it, if an axis is confirmed. Hope that explains things a little, let me know how you feel.
