I shall start developing one at once.TheAlphaWolf said:That's sad. Are you really that desperate?
Communist hamster:
I don't really get that either... but if it never had a brain or any other organs, it's not morally wrong to eat it, since it never suffered or anything like it.
Would eating meat that has been grown in a vat by genetic science be morally wrong? It never had a brain or indeed any other organs
Theoryofrelativity said:When and why does humans killing animals to eat become a moral issue if at all?
James R said:If humanity converted to a vegetarian diet tomorrow, then the currently-living animals could be allowed to live their natural lives, but we would restrict their breeding to gradually reduce numbers. We could still preserve the species at whatever level was deemed appropriate - perhaps in special wildlife sanctuaries like the ones we already have for other species which we don't eat.
Arguing that the meat industry is somehow being kind by creating animals to be killed is a very stupid argument indeed.
Take a similar argument. We do not, in general, eat dogs. Have dogs gone extinct? Why not?
This reads like you're suggesting vegetarians are nicer, gooder, better people than meat eaters, knowing some vegetarians, can't AGREE 1millionth of a percentage with that at all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!perplexity said:With yourself in good order, good deeds follow naturally enough,
and to that end I mind what I eat.
---
Cattle ranching also destroys land.But we don't need efficent. Cultivating that land destroys what it was and you can nver get it back. Cattle ranching allows it to stay as it is.
1) no, killing is NOT killing. I have no qualms about eating beans. For one, fetuses do not feel pain, they don't think, they don't suffer, they don't have any emotions whatsoever. Cows, pigs, chickens, etc. do. Two, fetuses are not grown in horrible conditions only to be killed and eaten just for the pure pleasure of it. Cows and others are.Why are some anti animal cruelty vegetarians pro abortion! killing is killing?
Why do people call themsleves vegetarian when they eat fish? fish is livng creature not vegetable? Why don't they just say..I don't eat red/white meat?
Any vegetarians falling into above catagoriues like to share your views on this? Not an attack, genuinely curious?
and you've been saying things that suggest you think vegetarians are evil hypocrites who go around forcing people to be vegetarians and should all go to hell. (ok, maybe not that strongly)This reads like you're suggesting vegetarians are nicer, gooder, better people than meat eaters, knowing some vegetarians, can't AGREE 1millionth of a percentage with that at all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheAlphaWolf said:Cattle ranching also destroys land.
Theoryofrelativity:
1) no, killing is NOT killing. I have no qualms about eating beans. For one, fetuses do not feel pain, they don't think, they don't suffer, they don't have any emotions whatsoever. Cows, pigs, chickens, etc. do. Two, fetuses are not grown in horrible conditions only to be killed and eaten just for the pure pleasure of it. Cows and others are.
2)I don' tknow, that's stupid.
3) vegetables are living creatures
Theoryofrelativity
and you've been saying things that suggest you think vegetarians are evil hypocrites who go around forcing people to be vegetarians and should all go to hell. (ok, maybe not that strongly)
perplexity said:"I could be bounded in a nutshell, and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams."
(W Sakespeare, Hamlet: Act II, Scene II)
Theoryofrelativity,
you appear to think that you own some sort of authority to try the merit of vegetarians as a class.
I do not accept that authority.
I see no real point or purpose to such a trial, no foreseeable consequence to it,
nor even anything close to a satisfactory means to conduct it.
For as far as I am concerned you are scarcely more than a vexatious time wasting troll.
Please rather attend to your own,
issues within the domain of your personal power and responsibility.
---