And if the North Communist had not come south, there would have been no war either.
When did the US fund Ho Chi Minh? Do you have a source for that? Everything I have read shows Kennedy and the CIA backing the corrupt governments in the South from Day One.
Also, you are aware that your nation's buddies, the USSR, was providing pilots to the NVA and intelligence?
Yeah anything but the war the US imposed on her. Maybe she spontaneously burst into flames.
Ever single nation the U.S is forced to interact with become better. And Cuba would be a paradise right now.
170 million of them are poor
Iraq and Afghanistan shaping up to become the next popular tourist resorts.
Actually, Afghanistan has seen a notable boost in tourism recently.
And Vietnam is very much a popular tourist destination these days.
Might have thought of that before funding Ho Chi Minh, then reversing positions on him; boy that record has a deep groove, does it not?.
Remember the French? we had treaties with them to, and who was Ho Chi Min? at that time?
Russian weapons, Chinese weapons, invasion from the North of Regular Troops, the idea that this was a civil war was ridiculous, the V.C. ceased to exist after Tet of 68, and after that it was regulars from the North prosecuting the war.
Have they both expressed undying gratitude for their liberation to the US?
Surviving inspite of is very different from enabling. India is a tourist destination too and so are Native American reservations. Even the camps at Aushwitz pull in a lot of people with a fascination for history. Shall we thank the Nazis?
The assumption that the survival of the people of Iraq and Afghanistan (or Vietnam) somehow justifies their invasion and murder for ideological or made up reasons is a specious argument. Is that what they say to the veterans?
Wow, that sure came out of left field. Speaking of specious arguments, what does any of this have to do with anything? You're really all over the place today, even for you...
And all chinks are pawns in a cold war,
Liberating the Viets from the Chinese was fine, but France must be allowed her colonies.
And all chinks are pawns in a cold war, but when the Americans depend upon the Chinese for their economy, then ideology goes down the tubes.
No, America was generally very disapproving of European colonialism (you may recall this conflict known as the American Revolution, and another called the Spanish American War??). Vietnam was one of a handful of exceptions to a long-standing policy of opposition to colonialism, motivated entirely by early-Cold War hysteria over the spread of Communism. One which we've had ample time to regret.
Man, that's such a wildly inaccurate characterization of history that it's almost funny. The brazenness with which you pull unsupported narratives out of thin air to suit your momentary positions is somewhat impressive, even if the resulting rhetoric is not.