vitalone said:
Yes there would go look it up...you can't magically change 40 million bases so precisely in a few mutations...
So?
Seriously - do you have any idea what kinds of changes are possible in a few mutations, or how many mutations it takes to get a new species, on average, or what the genetic drift rate is for even an unevolving animal, over five million years?
You don't. Nor do you have any idea of the likelihood of the intervening species "between" Pan and Homo leaving traces of any kind.
vital said:
we can't understand how life forms existed, so the only way to understand it is to create an imaginary theory called evolution....
That's pretty close to historical: before Darwin, none of the explanations of species diversity and relationship fit the facts. All the creationist theories, for example, had proven worthless in scientific investigation.
Afterwards, all the facts slid into place like clockworks.
So far, nothing has contradicted Darwinian theory - even the discovery of DNA, a fundamental change and huge increase in the facts that had to fit, fit like a glove. It's as if some theory of plate tectonics and glaciers had been developed when people thought the world was flat, and it still worked when the shape was better determined.