Enmos
Valued Senior Member
I was just curious if any moral argument against it had been offered. I'm assuming not, by your answer.
Other than the religious ones, not that I'm aware of anyway.
I was just curious if any moral argument against it had been offered. I'm assuming not, by your answer.
Other than the religious ones, not that I'm aware of anyway.
Well, hopefully some rogue scientists somewhere in the world are working on it. I am positive that they are. Religious dogmas (not that there are any in this field) should not bind us.
That's just it, China-Genetic experiments are much more widely done than in the US-Are we backing ourselves into a technological corner?
We can't study cloning humans? Why not? Whether or not they have any legal rights is a seperate issue. Cloning technology just seems to be a good idea. "Mommy died when I was 2, so Daddy had them make me a NEW Mommy. I can't tell the difference!"
Why should it not ? What is your argument ?
No. Enmos you know better. The burden of proof lies upon you, as does your convincing us. The creation of the act/law banning cloning of humans was a mistake, that doesn't mean we argue from there. We(United States residents) live in a free country, and if any of our rights are taken away, there better be a damn good reason.
I'd just like to point out that just a hundred years ago, Computers were silly science fiction, and 50 years ago, AI was thought to be a simple weekend project for an intern. My point-50 years of study into the human brain and human cloning could give us cloning tech to the level seen in modern science fiction. If we don't study it, of course, progress will be much slower and more dangerous.