crazymikey said:
Do they behave by moving in unison with other "flares" fall toward the ground, and then fly back up into the air and cover several miles while in the same relative position? Please oh army expert, tell me more about these flares.
First, none of the footage I saw of the event depicted anything "flying." Second, yes, flares will all move in unison. They are fired by an artillery piece, they have a explosive event at a predetermined altitude, or are delievered by an aircraftat, at which time a parachute is deployed and they begin burning. If fired at the same time to the same location, this event occurs at the same time for each flare. They will "move" in unison as they descend based upon meteorlogical forces -shift laterally, suddenly drop a few feet in absence of lift, or even stall and rise in the presence of sudden lift. Air temperatures over the desert play imporant roles in the dynamics of a parachute.
crazymikey said:
Actually, the official explanation was not a military exercise. They claimed flares dropped from a A-10 "Warthog" caused the sightings? Umm, across 5 or so cities at the same time
The official explanation is really irrelevant from my perspective. I didn't seek one out. I looked at the footage, and applied what I saw there to what I saw perhaps 30 or 40 times in my military career.
crazymikey said:
Actually, Bubba does not muddle the situation at all. He is not the only witness to see a V shape flying object moving in formation. There are many who saw the same, including air force pilots. Still think flares, eh?
I think a lot of people
want to be witness and are. We have footage of the flares... but none of the so-called "v-shaped object?" Incidently, the F-117 is v-shaped and also has an otherworldly appearance when viewed flying at night. It's engine configuration makes the sound difficult to discern at various perspectives of observation, which is a design feature meant to thwart identification by enemy ground troops. I've had many of these fly overhead in black-out mode.
crazymikey said:
And I think he should listen to me - than you. Because, contaray to what you said, I don't call anything alien ships or anti-gravity technology that I can't explain. I've never claimed to having seeing a UFO, and believe you me, I've seen quite a lot of unknown things in the sky. While you call everything you can't explain - a weather baloon; a flare; a frisbee; a neon light; a flying pink elephant
I've seen many UFOs and believe each one has a more probable
earthly explanation than an
alien one. As a child, I witnessed a circular light that was many feet in diameter if it was only above the treetops that it slowly disappeared behind. It made no sound. Until I was 20, I believed it was a UFO from space. Sitting in Honduras on the Palmerola Air Base flightline in 1986, I saw the same exact object again. This time I was able to see it land. I had no idea that a Harrier jet could seem make very little sound if you were angled from it just right. Later I found out that Harrier jets were landing at a nearby base to my childhood home around the time I was 7.
Since then, I've questioned everything I see and refuse to give into anthing that defies probability simply because there is a willingness to believe.
Incidently, I don't buy the A-10 flare explanation. Those flares were too distant, too high and too bright. The A-10 flares are smaller with smaller parachutes, so they fall faster. Those were more likely to be Artillery flares.