Let's see your results on Quantum Physics experiments?
I have solved the theory of Everything
- Thread starter Pincho Paxton
- Start date
- Status
Let's see your results on Quantum Physics experiments?
The two slit experiment...
1/ Top slit open. Observed. Single Photon (white hole) Opens for Electrons to travel from observer, and from Photosensitive paper. The electrons from the observer slowing down the Aether in a wide beam creates a situation where all paths have equal opportunity from the observer to the photographic paper. Electrons slows down Aether gates in a hexagonal path to photographic paper. They only slow down those in a hegagonal path similar to how Lightening would. So a sort of winding path, up, and down over a hexagonal structure. This is a wave of sorts, but really because the path is a wavy line.
because this path has all equal opportunities, and all of the spins are the same speed because of the observer, there is a single dot, from a small area of electrons firing in the photographic paper. When the electrons fire, the Aether down the pathway is rocketed up to full speed, like a lightening bolt.
2/ Same for bottom slit.
3/ Both slits open. The white hole allows two electrons to pass through. Two dots. Two lightening pathways.
4/ No observer. No electron pathways to observer mean no flattening of the spin speeds of the Aether. Now when the Electron fires at the end of the experiment, the Aether is left spinning at full speed. The second journey for the electrons is now interfered with by super charged Aether. Now you get a curve on the paper, as the Electrons dodge their last path.
1/ Top slit open. Observed. Single Photon (white hole) Opens for Electrons to travel from observer, and from Photosensitive paper. The electrons from the observer slowing down the Aether in a wide beam creates a situation where all paths have equal opportunity from the observer to the photographic paper. Electrons slows down Aether gates in a hexagonal path to photographic paper. They only slow down those in a hegagonal path similar to how Lightening would. So a sort of winding path, up, and down over a hexagonal structure. This is a wave of sorts, but really because the path is a wavy line.
because this path has all equal opportunities, and all of the spins are the same speed because of the observer, there is a single dot, from a small area of electrons firing in the photographic paper. When the electrons fire, the Aether down the pathway is rocketed up to full speed, like a lightening bolt.
2/ Same for bottom slit.
3/ Both slits open. The white hole allows two electrons to pass through. Two dots. Two lightening pathways.
4/ No observer. No electron pathways to observer mean no flattening of the spin speeds of the Aether. Now when the Electron fires at the end of the experiment, the Aether is left spinning at full speed. The second journey for the electrons is now interfered with by super charged Aether. Now you get a curve on the paper, as the Electrons dodge their last path.
another oxymoron
quantum physics is math
the experiments are observable evidence
often the math is used to describe an experiment but most of them experiments don't fix the physics
and a specific arena to see this EVIDENCE and know the FACTS behind it, is in nano technology
ie.... look up nano tech (they create the environment but have no idea how the structures GROW)
it's still magic (or as i heard quoted by a PHD/NASA contract holder/instructor .........said........"the miracle")
or just read up on heisenberg............... it probably, perhaps, proportionally, randomly, and definitely an uncertainty to the cause is ........... dah
they never knew either/aether way
Sorry, but the aether hasn't been shown to exist. You're conclusions are flawed. Please demonstrate the aether exists.
are the electrons traveling? You must have that experiement in a vacuum, right?
i thought you said the aether aint movin?
why the electrons slowing down somthun, i would tink it be seeeeedin up stuff
what if i put a filter to cut the hexs up, into polarized electrons? (are you sure them electrons doing the crusin?)
coool...... be careful with magnets and them electrons, is will just ruin your whole experiment (just helping)
hecks go wavin? cool
so now the hecks are waivin but spinning coherantly?
that sound like a backfire and an old chevy
that is some really tough philosophy
and experimenting too
You just answered without reading anything. That's no use.
If you need anything clarifying fine. I never said that the Aether moves, I said it spins. There is no such thing as a Vacuum when you have Aether in it. Electrons make paths.. see lightening.
Clarify that the aether exists.
Hey PP..... i love any who tries but you have soo many items that are all over the board (impoosible)
i said it spins
is beyond foolish
go read up on the electric universe, if that is the path you like
but this section is not the place, to offer a Toe without feet
How about if I were to get lots of photos of woodlands, and add hexagon grids to them, and demonstrate that when perspective is equal to all trees in a row, their branches will all fit in the centre of hexagons?
If I did this, and got a percentage like 100% would that be the right way to prove it.
Or apple trees, and demonstrate that the apples at equal Z distances all fit into hexagons in the X?
Or grapes?
Of course you have to work out the correct lens distortion, and account for that in the process.
Or grapes?
Of course you have to work out the correct lens distortion, and account for that in the process.
Dude, Pincho..for the love of god and all that it sacred...PLEASE give me your weed dealers name! I got to get me some of THAT stuff! I want to solve major sciency stuff that I don't know anything about...that would be cool.
More likely pseudo-scienced.
A 'theory of everything' isn't a problem to be solved. Wrong use of english terms.
What kind of problems?
Delusion.
Of course not. You actually have to do work to demonstrate it.
Unlikely.
Correct. *You* are irrelevant to the "theory". If your work cannot stand on it's own then it fails.
Aether doesn't exist.
Incorrect. They are observable; hence, they exist.
Incorrect. You would be electrocuted in "sunlight" otherwise.
Useless analogy at this point.
The two-slit experiment works with any small particle. Even carbon balls.
Incorrect. Photons are observable; hence, they exist.
Incorrect. It is an energy field.
Incorrect. Hot air rises because it is lighter than cool air.
What is bose-einstein theory?
Incorrect. The Milky Way is our galaxy. Anything outside of it is "outside our galaxy".
We are energy collection machines and our brain is an organ that governs our bodies.
The Aether doesn't exist; however, space-time *might* be a have a smallest component that is a geometric shape (ex. triangles).
The sun is a star at the center of our solar system.
There are no such thing as numbers outside the scope of human minds. Numbers are symbolic representations of quantity.
Correct on the first part. On the second part, most likely your thread will get pseudo-scienced.
1...16 weren't in good shape and I suspect the rest would be in the same boat.
Like I said I expect this. Till you go... Oh WOW! later.
I know a way to prove it, I've figured it out. To eliminate lens distortion get a hexagon grid printed on some clear acetate that is flat. Then take photos through the acetate. I think you can eliminate the lens distortion then.
John Connellan
Valued Senior Member
Ah, but does your theory solve the riddle of the mysterious hexagon on Saturn?
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/media/cassini-20070327.html
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/media/cassini-20070327.html
Well yes. That's exactly what it is. The Aether. There doesn't have to be such an obvious Hexagon. Everything is a Hexagon Fractal. Even us. But gravity rounds off our edges. We are nothing more than fractal bubbles, full of Electron Pathways. Our veins align to an hexagon too, they are also electron pathways. When you see something on Earth that isn't a Hexagon you can explain it by where it grows, like a fish with uneven forces on its sides, or a fruit that lies flat on the ground. Or a leaf that squeezes towards the stem. The stem is then hexagons at that next scale. Or things that grow in a nut, or pip, they have forces applied by the nut, or pip's outer shell. Or Oranges for example. They conform a bit to the hexagon, but on the inside mostly to their hard outer wall. But of course things should conform to a hexagon because of their atom alignment, but that does not account for trees metres apart, or galaxies.
It's the theory of everything, it does explain everything.
It's the theory of everything, it does explain everything.
Last edited:
:roflmao:
Everything is explained. We can all go home now.
- Status