I have solved the theory of Everything

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there no way to just throw every known experiment at my theory and see that they all work. I have already done it, and what I have told you so far fixes all quantum experiments. I even found sentience from the theory.

Or do you have to actually be able to see the Aether?

Either way..... has too many oooops'es's'
 
You want to see the thing that creates vision, that is going to be difficult. But proposed experiment would be to change the spinning speed of the Aether to give the centrifugal forces some way of forming a picture. Cold works, tiny observers, I'm not a scientist. I could post my instant snowflake that uses the Aether to create nature?

Perhaps you didn't read my post. The aether has not been shown to exist.

It's clear from your opening post you aren't a scientist. In fact, it's clear you know nothing about the topic.
 
Perhaps you didn't read my post. The aether has not been shown to exist.

It's clear from your opening post you aren't a scientist. In fact, it's clear you know nothing about the topic.

You actually mean that there was no aether wind, but aether doesn't move it just spins in one place. Like I said, a revolving door.
 
No aether. No spinning. No revolving doors. Nada.


but that means; a boring night

or

philosphically; it dat stuff taint real, smoke more grass

is aether that stuff bugs was on, while running from the monster, going reeeeeeeeeal slowwwwww..

nighty-nite

nighty-nite

awwwwwwwwwwwwwwweeee.

.




















..

PEOPLE!
 
No aether. No spinning. No revolving doors. Nada.

I would need to see which experiment you are talking about, as there are so many flaws in experiments that I have to apply my theory to. Remember that your experiments took things like Photons for granted, and they were white holes, and so the experiments have to be recreated by my theory.
 
I would need to see which experiment you are talking about, as there are so many flaws in experiments that I have to apply my theory to. Remember that your experiments took things like Photons for granted, and they were white holes, and so the experiments have to be recreated by my theory.

Why don't you first do your own experiments to demonstrate the aether exists, then come back with your results and apply to other theories.
 
Why don't you first do your own experiments to demonstrate the aether exists, then come back with your results and apply to other theories.

I can't do anything here at home, apart from apply my theory to existing experiments. I would need funding to perform some new experiments. For example.. the Aether needs to be measured in the dark, else Electrons will keep resetting it.
 
I would need funding to perform some new experiments.

There's the problem. Unless you or your friends are extremely wealthy, it's unlikely hair-brained schemes such as yours will ever see a nickel of funding.

Of course, far more ridiculous notions such as yours have been funded. :shrug:
 
Well my theory is the theory of everything, and it's real, so it is worth Billions of pounds. Surely someone will fund it. Where do I go?
 
Here is my instant snowflake code. Download, unrar, run the program, and press space. I was working on changing the temperature to recreate all known snowflakes naturally with the Aether. The temperature gauge isn't finished yet....

Remember to press space bar after running...

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pinchopaxton/Gravity2.rar

Then compare it with a real snowflake...

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/snowcrystals/

I want it to create all of these at the correct temperatures, so that the Aether spin slows down, right down the the Bose-Einstein temperature.
 
Last edited:
Well my theory is the theory of everything, and it's real, so it is worth Billions of pounds. Surely someone will fund it. Where do I go?

No, it's not real, it's just a notion you dreamed up. It's worthless at this time.
 
No, it's not real, it's just a notion you dreamed up. It's worthless at this time.

What you just said was a notion, because you have carried out no experiments on my theory. My theory has been tested with about 20 experiments, but only by comparisons.

For example

Lightening.
The path is taken from the ground, up to the electrons in the cloud. Then the electrons fire. the path is a hexagon fractal.

Trees
Grow to reach the slower spinning aether, and when the aether has equal spin you get a fork. The tree shape fits a hexagonal fractal.
 
That is most likely a lie.

I mean comparisons, like photography, a whole forest has the same fractal as a single tree, that's a bit like the Nasa photo.

Or just by using my theory on Quantum physic experiments, and comparing my results. But only in theory. The results are what you would expect to happen. Nothing strange about them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top