Assange is not charged with rape. Sweden has some laws for situations that they consider not to be rape but still to be wrong. I think
I don't understand Swedish law. No means no and is rape. What is it when the guy who had sex while wearing a condom the night before wakes up in bed with his temporary lover and starts having sex with her without a condom before she wakes up? I think that is the "sex by surprise" charge. A guy who does that is selfish. If she says no and he does not stop then I think even by Swedish law it becomes rape. This "sex by surprise" charge gets the man fined $7,500.
The Sexual coercion charge is apparently about a force used to get sex in a situation in which the woman was neither giving nor withholding consent.
Sweden also apparently strongly wants to encourage condemn use and in some way that I don't understand has incorporated issues of condom use in it's laws about sexual behavior.
Good article: http://www.aolnews.com/world/articl...art-of-julian-assange-criminal-probe/19741444
Article has some charge detail: http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/dec/081210-WikiLeaks-Julian-Assange-consensual-Sex.htm
But the article is probably wrong about the Swedish condom laws which makes me wonder what else they got wrong.
Below, the same links I posted in post 18
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/a...user-cia-ties/
This link http://www.counterpunch.org/shamir09142010.html shows that one of the "victims" worked with people on the US intelligence payroll prior to having sex with Assange. This alleged leftist and fan of Wikileaks got thrown out of Cuba for being a subversive and writes anti-Castro articles. She may be a genuine feminist leftist and writing anti-Castro articles and associating with CIA assets and writing books on how to get revenge on men and having a history of making dubious accusations against men does not mean that she is not a real leftist and is not a real sexual victim of Assange's sexual selfishness. But she might be a straight up Western Intelligence asset who's job it was to accuse Assange.
Even if the account of what Assange did is truthful and even if the women initiated the case whether or not Western intelligence has influenced how the case has unfolded is still a reasonable question.
Why was the case dropped in September? Why was the case revived?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWh1Mk2_GVg#t=03m42s
Video of Assange explaining Wikileaks policy. In this video both alleged rape victims are present prior to having sex with A.
Maybe now that they have Assange in prison they might want to take this opportunity to do something that will shorten his life.
I don't understand Swedish law. No means no and is rape. What is it when the guy who had sex while wearing a condom the night before wakes up in bed with his temporary lover and starts having sex with her without a condom before she wakes up? I think that is the "sex by surprise" charge. A guy who does that is selfish. If she says no and he does not stop then I think even by Swedish law it becomes rape. This "sex by surprise" charge gets the man fined $7,500.
The Sexual coercion charge is apparently about a force used to get sex in a situation in which the woman was neither giving nor withholding consent.
Sweden also apparently strongly wants to encourage condemn use and in some way that I don't understand has incorporated issues of condom use in it's laws about sexual behavior.
Good article: http://www.aolnews.com/world/articl...art-of-julian-assange-criminal-probe/19741444
from aolnews said:The strange tale of Assange's brief flings with two Swedish women during a three-day period in mid-August -- and decisions by three different prosecutors to first dismiss rape allegations made by the women and then re-open the case -- has more twists, turns and conspiracy theories than any of Stieg Larsson's best-sellers.
True, one of Assange's accusers sounds tailor-made for those who think Assange is being set up in Sweden by dark CIA-backed operatives who want him smeared or silenced for his document dumping with WikiLeaks. She's a 31-year-old blond academic and member of the Social Democratic Party who's known for her radical feminist views, once wrote a treatise on how to take revenge against men and was once thrown out of Cuba for subversive activities.
But others say Assange, who denies any wrongdoing and says the sex was consensual, may have just run afoul of Sweden's unusual rape laws, which are considered pro-feminist because of the consideration given issues of consent when it comes to sexual activity -- including even the issue of whether a condom was used.
In fact, the current prosecutor, Marianne Ny, who re-opened the case against Assange, has been active in the proposed reforms of Swedish rape laws that would, if passed, involve an investigation of whether an imbalance in power between two people could void one person's insistence that the sex was consensual.
Swedish tabloids and the country's blogosphere have been rife since August with stories and speculation about Assange's accusers, the flip-flopping prosecutors and just what, if any, crime was committed by Assange during sex with the two women.
Article has some charge detail: http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/dec/081210-WikiLeaks-Julian-Assange-consensual-Sex.htm
But the article is probably wrong about the Swedish condom laws which makes me wonder what else they got wrong.
Below, the same links I posted in post 18
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/a...user-cia-ties/
This link http://www.counterpunch.org/shamir09142010.html shows that one of the "victims" worked with people on the US intelligence payroll prior to having sex with Assange. This alleged leftist and fan of Wikileaks got thrown out of Cuba for being a subversive and writes anti-Castro articles. She may be a genuine feminist leftist and writing anti-Castro articles and associating with CIA assets and writing books on how to get revenge on men and having a history of making dubious accusations against men does not mean that she is not a real leftist and is not a real sexual victim of Assange's sexual selfishness. But she might be a straight up Western Intelligence asset who's job it was to accuse Assange.
Even if the account of what Assange did is truthful and even if the women initiated the case whether or not Western intelligence has influenced how the case has unfolded is still a reasonable question.
Why was the case dropped in September? Why was the case revived?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWh1Mk2_GVg#t=03m42s
Video of Assange explaining Wikileaks policy. In this video both alleged rape victims are present prior to having sex with A.
Maybe now that they have Assange in prison they might want to take this opportunity to do something that will shorten his life.